=========================================================================
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 05:01:17 +0000
Reply-To: HPLX Mailing List ,
fjkaufman@WORLDNET.ATT.NET
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: "F. Kaufman"
Subject: Fluff Re: HP in the news
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> Btw, it's interesting that Digitial Research didn't sue that
> little startup company from Seattle who took their intellectual
Well, they finally got even today and shook us up good in Seattle! 6.8
earthquake that just kept on rolling................
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 22:59:01 -0600
Reply-To: HPLX Mailing List ,
Ed Keefe
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Ed Keefe
Subject: Re: Palmtop Paper
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Ken London asked
>>Is the e-mail palmtop paper still being published? I signed up for it
twice now and am still receiving nothing. I've noticed back issues on your
website but have received nothing to date.<<
The Palmtop email newsletter is in 'suspended animation mode' for now. I've
finally run out of things to say about the Palmtop. I don't like to send
email to people just to be sending email. I get email like this almost daily
and do my best to 'filter' it out. I also am somewhat 'thin-skinned' and
don't like dealing with 'flames' that come back, with each issue of the
newsletter, from dissatisfied recipients.
On the other hand, if the recent thread about a 'software project' takes
hold, that would be some good news for an email or two. I encourage the
folks who started the thread to keep unraveling it: see where it goes.
.ed.
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 14:02:11 -0800
Reply-To: cameronc@ix.netcom.com
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Claud Cameron
Subject: Re: Fluff: Einstein
Comments: To: Longden_Loo@CANDLE.COM
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello Longden (et al.),
Actually, well before he won the Nobel prize in 1921, Einstein worked on =
viscosity of fluids, specifically that of a dilute dispersion of solid sp=
heres. He published his first derivation of an expression for viscosity =
of this type of liquid and corrected the errors in it in a later paper in=
1911 (based upon experimental work).
- Claud
To: Longden Loo
Subject: RE: Fluff: Einstein
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Longden Loo İmailto:Longden_Loo@CANDLE.COM¨
> Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 9:02 AM
> Subject: Fluff: Einstein
>=20
>=20
> > This is a little like saying Einstein didn't know how to design
> > a bomb.
>=20
> Actually, he probably didn't.
>=20
> Theory, design and execution are separate, and Einstein was never (to=
my
> admittedly limited knowledge) a designer or an engineer.
>=20
> A semantical non-issue probably for everyone except the bomb=20
> designers .
>=20
> - Longden
>=20
_________________________________________________________________________=
__
Visit http://www.visto.com/info, your free web-based communications cente=
r.
Visto.com. Life on the Dot.
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 06:55:15 +0100
Reply-To: HPLX Mailing List ,
HP Staber
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: HP Staber
Subject: Re: HP in the news
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Barry,
>
>
> From the reading I've been doing about linux in the last couple
> of years, the producers of linux recognize that has to be dealt
> with and they are designing software to handle or at least ease
> the managment taks. My understanding of their approach (I'm not
> sure I have this right) is not to change linux to make it easier
> to use. They're adding layers that provide GUIs and tools to
> automatically handle linux as it is.
I've decided to make a dualboot setup with Win and Linux at the
beginning of the year. It forced me to look into
partitioning/organizing my harddisk which was a painfull but worthwhile
experience. While I have no clue about Linux itself the installation
was easy And the user interface is now windowslike with drag and drop,
folders, desktop symbols etc. I have decided to buy a full Debian
distribution package and will see further. I agree that Linux is
probably mor for the techie.
My main reason to look into Linux : I'm convinced that my siblings will
grow up with computers. It is not a given that Windhose remains the
dominant OS and I'm quite sure that Linux will have it's place. So they
should know and I want to know also.
HP Staber/Salzburg
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 06:50:29 +0100
Reply-To: HPLX Mailing List ,
Nathalie Bugeaud
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Nathalie Bugeaud
Subject: Re: HP in the news
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Peter A. Castro"
Thank you for writing so comprehensively, Peter
Business Week mentions a "Stinger Project" by Samsung and Microsoft - a
PocketPC and phone combined smaller than the HPLX but with larger screen.
a former list member writes:
Nope. I tried the Palm emulator on my desktop with a bunch of the leading
applications (mostly free or shareware) and decided to buy a second hand to
evaluate my writing capability. Fluent writing capability was obtained by
the end of the second hour of normal practice... Then sold my 100-LX with
not even the shadow of one regret. I must say that I was really tired of the
integrism of the HPLX list... the apology of DOS vs Windows was funny, but
the cult of the old HP products was really a bit too far for me. Yes quality
is globally changing the wrong way... But this kind of gadgets' power and
usability increased in a much more interesting manner in the recent past.
100/200LX were the right tools at their time. They're no longer. Just
evaluate the amount of available applications if you still need to be
convinced.
The french palm list : http://www.egroups.fr/group/palm-fr
-amities-
Nathalie :)
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 10:09:24 +0100
Reply-To: HPLX Mailing List ,
Laust Brock-Nannestad
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Laust Brock-Nannestad
Subject: FLUFF: Re: HP in the news
In-Reply-To: <3A9D200D.D9B9F001@zechine.wu-wien.ac.at>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Gerhard Gonter wrote:
> Btw, it's interesting that Digitial Research didn't sue that
> little startup company from Seattle who took their intellectual
> property to create a rivaling OS and later became a major
> predator when it comes to killing other startups who might be
> a rival in the future.
Well, Caldera finally sued Microsoft (after having bought the rights to
CP/M and Digital Research DOS from Novell) a couple of years ago. They
settled out of court...
Cheers,
Laust
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 15:08:33 +0000
Reply-To: HPLX Mailing List ,
Stefan.Peichl@T-ONLINE.DE
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Stefan Peichl
Subject: Re: PALMPC contra PALRUN
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
The CTRL-Z problem is finally solved thanks to Mark Crumpton,
who enlightened me in a private email. The source of the
problem is whether you use a QWERTY or QWERTZ keyboard.
Because the scancode of a key reflects its location on a
keyboard, there is a difference in the scancode for the Z and Y
keys depending on the keyboard in use. Note that the Z and Y
keys are just exchanged on QWERTY and QWERTZ keyboards.
CTRL-Z on a QWERTY keyboard has the scancode 2C hex, which
translates to 44 dec and means, it is the 44.character on the
keyboard.
CTRL-Z on a QWERTZ keyboard has the scancode 15 hex, which
means, it is the 21.character on the keyboard.
But now the interesting point: No matter which national palmtop
you use, the scancode for the Z key is always 2C hex, even if
the palmtop has a QWERTZ keyboard (like mine has).
However on my desktop QWERTZ keyboard, the scancode of Z is
15 hex, which is more correct because it is exactly it's
location on the keyboard.
Now who is wrong?
Stefan
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 09:05:05 -0500
Reply-To: HPLX Mailing List ,
Carole Kilpatrick
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Carole Kilpatrick
Organization: Oracle Corporation
Subject: CANNOT OPEN PHONE.PDB FILE
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------4D1D543787BBA81E0A154FD6"
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------4D1D543787BBA81E0A154FD6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Greetings:
Yesterday, I was able to open by phone.pdb file; today, I receive an
error message that I cannot.
Any suggestions??
Carole
Oracle
--------------4D1D543787BBA81E0A154FD6
Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii;
name="Carole.Kilpatrick.vcf"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: Card for Carole Kilpatrick
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename="Carole.Kilpatrick.vcf"
begin:vcard
n:Kilpatrick;Carole
tel;cell:248.760.4401
tel;fax:248.816.8270
tel;work:248.614.5117
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
version:2.1
email;internet:Carole.Kilpatrick@oracle.com
title:Install Base Sales Consultant
adr;quoted-printable:;;Oracle Corporation=0D=0A3290 West Big Beaver Road=0D=0ASuite 300;Troy;Michigan;48084;USA
x-mozilla-cpt:;2272
fn:Carole Kilpatrick
end:vcard
--------------4D1D543787BBA81E0A154FD6--
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 08:12:21 -0600
Reply-To: HPLX Mailing List ,
Theodore Heise
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Theodore Heise
Subject: Re: PALMPC contra PALRUN
In-Reply-To: <14YTko-072ffEC@fwd01.sul.t-online.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
On Thu, 1 Mar 2001, Stefan Peichl wrote:
> The CTRL-Z problem is finally solved thanks to Mark Crumpton,
> who enlightened me in a private email. The source of the
> problem is whether you use a QWERTY or QWERTZ keyboard.
Aha! This sounds very much like the problem you helped me solve
with my use of LIGHTON a year or two ago. :)
Ted
--
Theodore W. Heise West Lafayette, IN, USA
PGP public key: http://showcase.netins.net/web/twheise/theise.txt
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 15:19:56 +0100
Reply-To: HPLX Mailing List , BOCHE@DE.IBM.COM
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Ulrich Boche
Subject: Re: More info on corrupt, password-protected notes file
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Thursday, 01.03.2001 at 00:12 GMT, Russel Brooks wrote:
> Ulrich Boche wrote:
> > This is rather strange since Memo and the database engine use different
> > encrytion methods.
> > HPCRACK only works with database files, by the way.
>
> Interesting, the SUPER description says it works on DB, Note,
> Phone, Appointment, and World time files.
>
> I recommended trying HPCRACK based on this description.
>
I somehow related this corruption problem with Memo although I should have
seen that the application was Note. Sorry for the brain check.
All the applications you listed are using the HP 200 LX database engine.
That's also why DBCHECK works for all of them. What I meant was not just
GDB files, but all files handled by the database engine.
Ulrich Boche
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 15:23:54 +0100
Reply-To: HPLX Mailing List , BOCHE@DE.IBM.COM
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Ulrich Boche
Subject: Re: More info on corrupt, password-protected notes file
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Thursday, 01.03.2001 at 00:12 GMT, Russel Brooks wrote:
> Jeffrey Veiss wrote:
> > It looks like the problem started when I tried to change the password
from
> > one password to another. I tried it again on a copy of my backup and
it
> > corrupted the backup copy. I restored it again and changed the
password
> > to nothing, closed and reopened the file, and then set the new
password.
>
> Let me suggest that your main problem is using the builtin pw
> protection. It isn't very secure due to HPCRACK. If you have
> data worth protecting I recommend using SecureDevice
> (SECDEV14.ZIP on SUPER) to create an encrypted logical drive.
> On this drive you can have your applications place their files.
>
This is an excellent suggestion. But he should make really sure that he has
sorted out and fixed his data corruption problems first or he might end up
with an encrypted and corrupted logical drive.
Ulrich Boche
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 09:31:43 -0500
Reply-To: HPLX Mailing List ,
Domingo
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Domingo
Subject: Re: Big fat CF cards.
Comments: To: "Owen H. Morgan"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Anyone knows if this card will work on the HPLX without
drivers? I though I read somewhere that the problem which
affects large PCMCIA cards does not affect large CF cards. Is
that correct?
Domingo
----- Original Message -----
From: "Owen H. Morgan"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 10:54 AM
Subject: Re: Big fat CF cards.
> ORLANDO, FL, Feb. 12, 2001 - SanDisk Corporation
> (NASDAQ: SNDK) today introduced a 512 megabyte
> (MB)CompactFlash(tm) (CF) memory card, the
> world's highest capacity, standard CF Type I card.
My immediate comment would be WOW! How I'd love to have one of
those big fat 512Mb CF's. Still, I think the 192Mb cards
Longden mentioned would probably be more realistic for my
wallet at the moment. Maybe those will be coming down in price
a bit now? (He said hopefully... )
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 07:19:57 -0800
Reply-To: HPLX Mailing List ,
Longden_Loo@CANDLE.COM
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Longden Loo
Subject: Re: CANNOT OPEN PHONE.PDB FILE
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Yesterday, I was able to open by phone.pdb file; today, I receive an
> error message that I cannot.
>
> Any suggestions??
1) are you sure you're pointing to the correct file? Try File/Open and get
to the phone.pdb that way.
2) if that fails, reboot and try again
3) if that fails, make a copy of phone.pdb and then use a restored copy
from your backups. If the backup copy works, then the master phone.pdb has
a problem, and there are a variety of recovery things to try (like using
dbcheck or garlic from the SUPER site).
- Longden
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 10:23:17 -0500
Reply-To: HPLX Mailing List ,
Steve
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Steve
Subject: Re: IR x-fer LX <-->OB800
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Al Kind wrote:
> Has anybody successfully configured a good method to transfer filse
> between an LX and OB800 vai IR? I have tries X-finder & XFS with
> little success. I think I tried TransFile as well a while back with
> no luck.
>
> Cheers...AJKind
Longden Loo wrote:
> > I've tried the same with no success. Even the older Omnibooks seem to
> > resist most methods of transfer between the LX and the OBs using IR, =
Hrmm:
Based on discussions on the list, and being a bit
brain dead one evening, I bought an Omnibook 800
on e-Bay to supplemant my 200LX. Unfortunately
it came without a manual. It has Win 98 installed.
So, two questions... 1) How do you access the IR
port? Win 98 has drivers installed, but that seems
rather meaningless as nothing refers to them. 2)
is there anyway to clean/lube the (blankity blank)
keyboard so it doesn't stick?
I guess there are any number of other questions as
well. So, is there a web address to explain what
the function key is used for and any other Omnibook
specific info?
I'm willing to test the 800 <-> 200 IR, but am dead
in the water as of now.
Steve
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 11:47:31 -0500
Reply-To: HPLX Mailing List ,
Andrew Lovell
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Andrew Lovell
Subject: Re: IR x-fer LX <-->OB800
Comments: To: Steve
In-Reply-To: <3.0.6.16.20010301092357.1a5f659e@Server030.FWB.SAIC.Com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Hi
Try
http://www.data-plumber.com/
http://www.technoir.nu/omnibook/omnilist/index.html
http://home.earthlink.net/~qman
Regards
Andrew
>
>I guess there are any number of other questions as
>well. So, is there a web address to explain what
>the function key is used for and any other Omnibook
>specific info?
>
>I'm willing to test the 800 <-> 200 IR, but am dead
>in the water as of now.
>
>Steve
>
>** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
>
>
>
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 11:46:37 -0600
Reply-To: HPLX Mailing List ,
Theodore Heise
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Theodore Heise
Subject: Fluff: Re: More info on corrupt, password-protected notes file
In-Reply-To:
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
On Thu, 1 Mar 2001, Ulrich Boche wrote:
> This is an excellent suggestion. But he should make really sure that he has
> sorted out and fixed his data corruption problems first or he might end up
> with an encrypted and corrupted logical drive.
Would this make it then an illogical drive?
Ted
--
Theodore W. Heise West Lafayette, IN, USA
PGP public key: http://showcase.netins.net/web/twheise/theise.txt
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 11:06:50 -0700
Reply-To: HPLX Mailing List , kopplin@TECHNOIR.NU
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Mike Kopplin
Subject: Re: IR x-fer LX <-->OB800
In-Reply-To: <3.0.1.16.20010301174100.555ff386@pop.algonet.se>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
On Thu, 1 Mar 2001, Andrew Lovell wrote:
> http://www.data-plumber.com/
>
> http://www.technoir.nu/omnibook/omnilist/index.html
Please use http://www.omnibook.org/omnilist/ to access the
Omnibook list archives. The old url still works, but may go away
at some time in the future.
> http://home.earthlink.net/~qman
Regards,
Mike Kopplin
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 12:21:55 -0600
Reply-To: HPLX Mailing List ,
Barry
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Barry
Subject: FLUFF: Re: HP in the news
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Owen H. Morgan said:
>
> Oh, and in case you wondered, the OS
> is called EPOC and is found on Psion,
> Ericsson and Nokia palmtops amongst others.
Geos was also designed (well, totally redesigned) to work on a
PDA with or without a keyboard. What might make it more
interesting to LX users is that it sit's on top of DOS. It's a
multitasking GUI for Dos and I think it uses non-preemtive
multitasking, but I'm not sure I remember that right.
There are a number of apps written for it and a pretty complete
set of apps is included with it.
I'm not sure I've seen it mentioned much in this group but it
probably wouldn't be too hard to get it working on the LX. I'm
not sure if it's freeware now or still being sold or in a
confused state. But there are free versions of it around that
they released as demos.
Oh yeah, there's also a development system for it.
Another GUI that should work on the LX, probably right out of
the box, is GEM. There are also a number of applications
written for it, but they might be hard to find now. A number of
applications were included with it, too. If I remember right,
it used preemptive multitasking. And it was a bit buggy. But
it was very usable. I don't think it was as buggy as Windows.
There was also a development kit available for Gem.
I'll be a little surprised if Gem isn't freeware now. It was
made by Digital Research and was probably part of the bundle
that Novel sold to Caldera. Most of that stuff is free today.
Actually I just looked for Gem and it seems that it is now
licensed under GNU. Dos versions are available for download as
are a number of apps and development tools and documentation,
technical and otherwise. It seems that there is still active
development going on.
Barry
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 20:12:04 +0100
Reply-To: HPLX Mailing List ,
HP Staber
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: HP Staber
Subject: Re: Digest Filter
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> Hello Everyone:
> I would like to read the opinions of the members of the list =
regarding
> filtering software for the mail digest. I spend quite a bit of time =
looking
> over messages that, while interesting to others, don't relate to my
> situation. The list used to have a format that would list each individua=
l
> message according to its subject line, and that was just perfect. It =
was a
> kind of an outline of the topics. That site/format still exists, but =
its last
> message is dated November of 2000. The software would be best if it ran =
on my
> PC, but if it worked on the 200LX, that would be OK. I've checked D&A =
and the
> SUPER site to no avail. I'm sure there are commercial programs that =
will sort
> mail in one's mailbox, but what about sorting by topic "inside" the =
digest?
I'm not sure if I understand your questions correctly.
POST/LX lets you download mails from e-mail lists in digest mode and
eplodes the digest into single messages upon arrival at the palmtop.
Next you can filter e-mails into dedicated mailfolders - I do that with
this list which ends up in a seperate HPLX-L folder.
Within each folder you can sort messages either through the menu
command or by hitting Ctrl-S and then selecting the sort order
(subject, from, to, date, original order).
If that suits your needs I'd be happy to get you going.
HP Staber/Salzburg
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 09:12:17 +1300
Reply-To: HPLX Mailing List ,
Tony Kan
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Tony Kan
Subject: Re: FLUFF: Re: HP in the news
Comments: To: Barry
In-Reply-To: <003001c0a27c$7f76a420$54fc36d8@oemcomputer>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Geos has been resurrected as NewDeal (see www.newdeal.com). It only
supports 286 AT class computers and above. Notwithstanding that, it gives
80-90% of the functionality of MS Windows/MS Office while only taking up
10Mb of HDD space. Its breathed new life into my 486 Thinkpad 701c! For
example, NewDeal has a built in word processor, flat file database and
spreadsheet. Lots of people still have the earlier Geoworks which does work
on an XT class machine and these early versions are still file compatible
with NewDeal.
HTH
-----Original Message-----
From: HPLX Mailing List İmailto:HPLX-L@UCONNVM.UCONN.EDU¨On Behalf Of
Barry
Sent: Friday, 2 March 2001 07:22
To: HPLX-L@UCONNVM.UCONN.EDU
Subject: FLUFF: Re: HP in the news
> Owen H. Morgan said:
>
> Oh, and in case you wondered, the OS
> is called EPOC and is found on Psion,
> Ericsson and Nokia palmtops amongst others.
Geos was also designed (well, totally redesigned) to work on a
PDA with or without a keyboard. What might make it more
interesting to LX users is that it sit's on top of DOS. It's a
multitasking GUI for Dos and I think it uses non-preemtive
multitasking, but I'm not sure I remember that right.
There are a number of apps written for it and a pretty complete
set of apps is included with it.
I'm not sure I've seen it mentioned much in this group but it
probably wouldn't be too hard to get it working on the LX. I'm
not sure if it's freeware now or still being sold or in a
confused state. But there are free versions of it around that
they released as demos.
Oh yeah, there's also a development system for it.
Another GUI that should work on the LX, probably right out of
the box, is GEM. There are also a number of applications
written for it, but they might be hard to find now. A number of
applications were included with it, too. If I remember right,
it used preemptive multitasking. And it was a bit buggy. But
it was very usable. I don't think it was as buggy as Windows.
There was also a development kit available for Gem.
I'll be a little surprised if Gem isn't freeware now. It was
made by Digital Research and was probably part of the bundle
that Novel sold to Caldera. Most of that stuff is free today.
Actually I just looked for Gem and it seems that it is now
licensed under GNU. Dos versions are available for download as
are a number of apps and development tools and documentation,
technical and otherwise. It seems that there is still active
development going on.
Barry
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 13:44:15 -0700
Reply-To: HPLX Mailing List ,
Richard and Patti Smith
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Richard and Patti Smith
Organization: Orion On-Site Computer Services
Subject: Re: HP in the news
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Ken Hansen wrote:
>
> Visicalc was written by an MBA student
> who was tired of performing mathmatical
> calculations on columns of numbers by
> hand over and over again. He didn't know
> anything about spreadsheet programs (they
> hadn't been invented until he invented it),
And, then, Barry wrote
> ... I felt, on being shown through Visicalc that this was one
of the most
> amazing things I'd ever seen. It was such a brilliant and
> beautiful and new idea and such a dramatic departure from
> anything that was expected from software or computers before.
I
> remember thinking that there really is something new under the
> sun. I think I even said that, corny as it is. :)
I guess it just goes to show that some of the best and most
creative ideas come from those who don't know any better! ;-)
Richard A. Smith
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 17:10:44 -0500
Reply-To: HPLX Mailing List ,
Domingo
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Domingo
Subject: Geos on the HP200LX
Comments: To: Barry
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
----- Original Message -----
From: "Barry"
To:
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2001 1:21 PM
Subject: FLUFF: Re: HP in the news
> Geos was also designed (well, totally redesigned) to work on
a
> PDA with or without a keyboard. What might make it more
> interesting to LX users is that it sit's on top of DOS.
It's a
> multitasking GUI for Dos and I think it uses non-preemtive
> multitasking, but I'm not sure I remember that right.
> There are a number of apps written for it and a pretty
complete
> set of apps is included with it.
> I'm not sure I've seen it mentioned much in this group but
it
> probably wouldn't be too hard to get it working on the LX.
I'm
> not sure if it's freeware now or still being sold or in a
> confused state. But there are free versions of it around
that
> they released as demos.
If I recall correctly, Tony Hutchings was running Geos on his
hplx during the time of the old list. After the new list got
started, he didn't seem to show his face around here much
anymore. But if he is around, he is your man for Geos on the
hplx.
Domingo
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 06:47:28 +0800
Reply-To: star_byte@iprimus.com.au
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Harry Oldenhuis
Subject: Re: HP in the news
Comments: To: Ken London
In-Reply-To: <3A9C9CCE.D8EDE5E3@beld.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hello Ken
I think you have a problem sitting at home :)
I sell and repair computers and find more and more people are using Unix
I also belong to the Computer Angels Club who gives away redundant computers
to the needy who cant afford them
The computers are installed with Unix slack ware and all users are learning
Unix
nobody has askt for Windoze, for them it is a learning curve and thy don't
know how to run
Windoze or Dos thy are very happy with the computers
There are also a lot of companies running Unix servers with great success
I think there will be a time when Windoze will crash for good as another
system
will take over people will always go for the cheapest thing available
Sorry to be so blunt with You
Cheers
Harry
-----Original Message-----
From: HPLX Mailing List İmailto:HPLX-L@UCONNVM.UConn.Edu¨On Behalf Of
Ken London
Sent: Wednesday, 28 February 2001 2:38 PM
To: HPLX-L@UCONNVM.UConn.Edu
Subject: Re: HP in the news
In this whole disccussion about linux the bottom line is if are looking for
an operating system that is more reliable than windows you are not
going to find in linux. I've heard from many people that linux is not any
more reliable than windoze and in some cases worse.
So if linux is so great as people keep saying how come the linux
companies are tanking on wall street? How come linux isn't flying off
the shelves at computer stores? When I was in a local computer store
yesterday I didn't see anyone preventing people from buying Linux. So why
isn't it selling?
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 00:18:38 +0200
Reply-To: HPLX Mailing List ,
Daniel Hertrich
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Daniel Hertrich
Subject: fluff: Re: Linux vs Palm vs 200LX, was: HP in the news
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Hi friends,
On Wed, 28 Feb 2001 11:21:27 -0700, Richard and Patti Smith wrote:
> In my experience, Linux is similar to sitting on a pair of
> scissors -- if you get my meanin' (a pain in the a--). Sure,
> it's open source and written by a half a million programmers
> from around the world, but therein lies the problem: you can't
> get a consistent user interface and you can't get consistent
> hardware support. It's a nightmare to learn and not much better
> to use. I tried it for several months and gave up. It's great
> for super-geeks who can also program assembly in their sleep,
> but it ain't ready for prime time; normal people will pull their
> hair out! And people say that DOS is hard to use!
Actually, I didn't want to chime in that fluff thread, but now I can't
stand all that crap about linux anymore ;-)
I'm certainly not a super-geek and I also can't program in assambly
language. But I got used to Linux very well. Now I nearly only work
with linux and I only run Windows when I have to work on Word or Excel
files (even then I could use Linux's Staroffice, but it's not FULLY
compatible).
For the last few years I had both systems in parallel on my machine and
moved peu-a-peu all my work to Linux.
And, please consider: Nowadays the well-known distributions of Linux
have great graphical installation and configuration tools that do most
of the work for you. Installing Linux that way, you get a running
system. You still have to do much configuration work manually,
especially if you have less common hardware (TV cards, professional
sound cards, scanners etc.). But after some time reading manuals and
docs, you should be able to do the work.
It's good to have some C programming skills, but it'S not mandatory.
Using a graphical user interface like KDE2, which is a really great
GUI, much more capabilities than every Windows version!!, Linux is
nearly as simple in usage as Windows.
KDE2 combines all the advantages of all GUIs of the OSs. There are
influences by Windows, OS/2, BeOS, MacOS and probably many others. And
you really can hardly crash a Linux box. It's possible, especially if
you use hardware that's not very well supported, or if you configured
womething wrong (hardware ressource assignment). But otherwise Linux is
EXTREMELY stable. If some program crashes, simply kill it and go on
with your other programs. The whole machine won't be locked at all.
Since every program is configurable with human-readable ASCII files,
you can configure everything to your needs, unlike Windows and its
programs, which can only be configured as far as the configuration
tools allow.
The greatest advantages of linux are
- networking capabilities
- configuration
- stability
- very scalable: runs on evry system that has at least a 386 and about
4MB of RAM.
- user can add / modify every feature, due to the open source
I've worked a lot ith different OSs, including Win NT4 at work, Linux
at home, Win95 at work and at home, DOS of course ;-)... NAd Linux is
by far the most reliable and transparent (!) system. If you WANT to
understand it. If you don't want to, you won't. It's quite some work to
understand it, if you never worked with Unix or Linux before.
I hope this clarifies a few of your doubts about Linux. I tried to
describe it as objectively as possible, although I'm a big fan of
linux ;-)
And at last, to become on-topic, it is NOT possible to run any kind of
linux on the 200LX, since Linux needs at least a 386. Minix on the LX
is too limited to be useful in my opinion. So we have to wait for the
Morphy one, buy a Toshiba Libretto-like machine or carry a full-sized
notebook to run linux on the road.
I think Palmtops that will run Linux WILL come, but they will also have
their limitations. Linux will be pre-installed in ROM, maybe upgradable
via flash, but you won't be able to customize it as freely as on a real
PC. Otherwise the whole thing would be too complicated to be attractive
to enough potential buyers.
But I will certainly be one of the first people who buys one! 8-)
GTX
daniel
--
Celia & Daniel Hertrich d.hertrich@gmx.de
home page: http://www.daniel-hertrich.de
mobile phone: +49 (0)177 7955549
unified messaging (fax,voice): +49 (0)721 151 306690
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 19:20:06 -0500
Reply-To: HPLX Mailing List ,
Ken London
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Ken London
Subject: Re: HP in the news
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Harry Oldenhuis wrote:
> Hello Ken
>
> I think you have a problem sitting at home :)
> I sell and repair computers and find more and more people are using Unix
> I also belong to the Computer Angels Club who gives away redundant computers
> to the needy who cant afford them
> The computers are installed with Unix slack ware and all users are learning
> Unix
> nobody has askt for Windoze, for them it is a learning curve and thy don't
> know how to run
> Windoze or Dos thy are very happy with the computers
> There are also a lot of companies running Unix servers with great success
> I think there will be a time when Windoze will crash for good as another
> system
> will take over people will always go for the cheapest thing available
>
> Sorry to be so blunt with You
> Cheers
> Harry
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: HPLX Mailing List İmailto:HPLX-L@UCONNVM.UConn.Edu¨On Behalf Of
> Ken London
> Sent: Wednesday, 28 February 2001 2:38 PM
> To: HPLX-L@UCONNVM.UConn.Edu
> Subject: Re: HP in the news
>
> In this whole disccussion about linux the bottom line is if are looking for
> an operating system that is more reliable than windows you are not
> going to find in linux. I've heard from many people that linux is not any
> more reliable than windoze and in some cases worse.
>
> So if linux is so great as people keep saying how come the linux
> companies are tanking on wall street? How come linux isn't flying off
> the shelves at computer stores? When I was in a local computer store
> yesterday I didn't see anyone preventing people from buying Linux. So why
> isn't it selling?
>
> ** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
I originally raised the question because I wanted to run Linux on the 200lx and
was disappointed to find it is not possible.
People keep saying how great linux is so I wanted to give it a try on the 200lx,
alas
it it not to be. Can it really be that good an operating system if it won't run
on the 200lx?
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 00:52:45 +0000
Reply-To: HPLX Mailing List ,
Russel Brooks
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
Comments: RFC822 error: Incorrect or incomplete address field found and
ignored.
From: Russel Brooks
Subject: Re: CANNOT OPEN PHONE.PDB FILE
Comments: To: Carole Kilpatrick
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Carole Kilpatrick wrote:
> Yesterday, I was able to open by phone.pdb file; today, I receive an
> error message that I cannot.
Got a backup?
In the future run DBCHECK against the file to be sure it is good
before backing it up.
Also, please don't send HTML to the list.
Cheers... Russ
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 19:53:09 -0500
Reply-To: HPLX Mailing List ,
Carole Kilpatrick
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Carole Kilpatrick
Organization: Oracle Corporation
Subject: Re: CANNOT OPEN PHONE.PDB FILE
Comments: To: Russel Brooks
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------AA24E206A66CFA29E5E20E17"
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------AA24E206A66CFA29E5E20E17
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Greetings:
Apologies to all, however, as I encountered this while at the office, and
given the urgency of the matter, I issued the email under my office email
(which, unfortunately, has a .vcf file attached).
On a go forward basis, any need to access this list for information will be
done under a more kinder, and gentler, email.
Carole
Oracle
Russel Brooks wrote:
> Carole Kilpatrick wrote:
> > Yesterday, I was able to open by phone.pdb file; today, I receive an
> > error message that I cannot.
>
> Got a backup?
>
> In the future run DBCHECK against the file to be sure it is good
> before backing it up.
>
> Also, please don't send HTML to the list.
>
> Cheers... Russ
>
> ** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
--------------AA24E206A66CFA29E5E20E17
Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii;
name="Carole.Kilpatrick.vcf"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: Card for Carole Kilpatrick
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename="Carole.Kilpatrick.vcf"
begin:vcard
n:Kilpatrick;Carole
tel;cell:248.760.4401
tel;fax:248.816.8270
tel;work:248.614.5117
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
version:2.1
email;internet:Carole.Kilpatrick@oracle.com
title:Install Base Sales Consultant
adr;quoted-printable:;;Oracle Corporation=0D=0A3290 West Big Beaver Road=0D=0ASuite 300;Troy;Michigan;48084;USA
x-mozilla-cpt:;2272
fn:Carole Kilpatrick
end:vcard
--------------AA24E206A66CFA29E5E20E17--
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 09:26:46 +0800
Reply-To: star_byte@iprimus.com.au
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Harry Oldenhuis
Subject: Re: HP in the news
Comments: To: Ken London
In-Reply-To: <3A9EE736.E3F6184E@beld.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hello Ken
Yes it can be done, you have to get somebody to burn the instruction set
Unix
into the EPROM that is in the lx200 to change the configuration
to start the software and you are away and running
At the moment Dos 5 is in the EPROM, you could probably change it over and
burn a new set
failing that you could buy a new EPROM and burn it.
I have a EPROM Burner here to do the job
I had the first Clone IBM 8086 here in west Australia with IBM basic in 5
EPROM's
every Tom Dick and Harry wanted a copy.
I have not pulled apart a LX200 to see what is inside or what size the EPROM
is.
There is software available to copy all the software that is in the EPROM
out
and have a look at it and see what size it is.
You must remember that Dos in the LX200 is a cut down version
and you would have to do the same with Unix.
A Unix programmer would be able to help you with that.
I hope this helps
Cheers Harry
>
> ** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
>I originally raised the question because I wanted to run Linux on the 200lx
and
>was disappointed to find it is not possible.
>People keep saying how great linux is so I wanted to give it a try on the
200lx,
>alas
>it it not to be. Can it really be that good an operating system if it
won't run
>on the 200lx?
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 10:57:25 +0800
Reply-To: HPLX Mailing List ,
Adrian Ho
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Adrian Ho
Subject: Re: HP in the news
Comments: To: Ken London
In-Reply-To: <3A9EE736.E3F6184E@beld.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
On Thu, 1 Mar 2001, Ken London wrote:
> I originally raised the question because I wanted to run
> Linux on the 200lx and was disappointed to find it is not
> possible.
Linux was not designed to run on anything that doesn't have an
MMU, among other things. That was a reasonable design decision
in its day, and it still is -- try counting the number of
multiuser, multitasking OSes that _don't_ use an MMU.
Still, some folks are working on special-casing the MMU out of
the kernel (the ELKS project comes immediately to mind). This
will likely cripple the kernel somewhat, but the essential
flavor will still be there.
> People keep saying how great linux is so I wanted to give it
> a try on the 200lx, alas it it not to be. Can it really be
> that good an operating system if it won't run on the 200lx?
People (like me) keep saying how great the 200lx is, but can it
really be that good a palmtop if it won't run AutoCAD 2000?
Horses for courses, Ken.
--
Adrian Ho aholx@mailandnews.com
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 11:17:34 +0800
Reply-To: HPLX Mailing List ,
Adrian Ho
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Adrian Ho
Subject: Re: FLUFF: Re: Linux vs Palm vs 200LX, was: HP in the news
Comments: To: Daniel Hertrich
In-Reply-To:
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
On Fri, 2 Mar 2001, Daniel Hertrich wrote:
> Actually, I didn't want to chime in that fluff thread, but
> now I can't stand all that crap about linux anymore ;-)
I don't think Richard's and/or Patti's comments are "crap"; they
did try it out and just didn't like it much. It's unfortunate
that the specific distribution didn't work for them, but not
many people have the time & resources to try 5-6 different ones.
In any case, those were honest opinions based on personal
experience, and while they were slightly hyperbolic (last I
checked, I'm no assembly god), they did contain more than a few
kernels of truth (esp. w.r.t. UI consistency and problems with
hardware support). They at least deserve careful consideration.
Conclusions (both positive and negative) based on _other_
people's opinions, and without personal experience, are another
matter entirely. I wouldn't call them "crap" either, but I'm
not sure what term to use. "Misguided", perhaps?
--
Adrian Ho aholx@mailandnews.com
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 22:09:38 -0500
Reply-To: HPLX Mailing List ,
Ken London
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Ken London
Subject: Re: HP in the news
Comments: To: Adrian Ho
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
People keep saying how great Linux is. As far as I can tell it is a
miserable
failure because it can't run on the 200lx. That makes it no better than
DOS.
Windoze can't run on the 200lx either, but very few people are saying
how
great windoze is. So if linux is a failiure on the 200lx, what good is
it?
If won't run on the 200lx it is no better than DOS. What good is it?
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 13:21:17 +0800
Reply-To: jimmytan@yeos.com.my
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: jimmytan@YEOS.COM.MY
Subject: Geos on the HP200LX
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
GEOS is well suited for devices with touch-screen capability. But the 200LX does
not have it so is there any point to run it on one? Perhaps the apps are really
good, I don't know and I honestly haven't used one before.
Just my thoughts.
Jimmy.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Barry"
To:
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2001 1:21 PM
Subject: FLUFF: Re: HP in the news
> Geos was also designed (well, totally redesigned) to work on a
> PDA with or without a keyboard. What might make it more
> interesting to LX users is that it sit's on top of DOS. It's a
> multitasking GUI for Dos and I think it uses non-preemtive
> multitasking, but I'm not sure I remember that right.
> There are a number of apps written for it and a pretty complete
> set of apps is included with it.
> I'm not sure I've seen it mentioned much in this group but it
> probably wouldn't be too hard to get it working on the LX. I'm
> not sure if it's freeware now or still being sold or in a
> confused state. But there are free versions of it around that
> they released as demos.
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 01:40:05 -0500
Reply-To: HPLX Mailing List ,
Walter Francis
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Walter Francis
Subject: Re: HP in the news
In-Reply-To: <3A9EE736.E3F6184E@beld.net> from "Ken London" at Mar 01,
2001 07:20:06 PM
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> > From: HPLX Mailing List İmailto:HPLX-L@UCONNVM.UConn.Edu¨On Behalf Of
> > Ken London
> > Sent: Wednesday, 28 February 2001 2:38 PM
> > To: HPLX-L@UCONNVM.UConn.Edu
> > Subject: Re: HP in the news
> >
> > In this whole disccussion about linux the bottom line is if are looking for
> > an operating system that is more reliable than windows you are not
> > going to find in linux. I've heard from many people that linux is not any
> > more reliable than windoze and in some cases worse.
I've been reading this discussion, and can't imagine where it originated,
and why it turned into the topic it did.
None the less, I'm unsure what you're implying by saying that Linux is less
reliable than Windows.. Define reliable.. Do you mean stablity in that you
can rely that the computer will not crash, and if a program does crash it
doesn't affect the rest of the computer? I would think not..
Perhaps by reliable you mean compatability with hardware.. That sometimes
can be an issue with the very latest hardware, but typically Linux supports
any normal piece of hardware, and many less normal.
I have ran Linux (Red Hat) for three years, and I've had the entire computer
lock up four times.. All four times I was running a pre-release of the
kernel that was not ready for real use. Otherwise, I have minor problems
out of Netscape and a few other programs, but they simply crash or lock up
themselves, leaving everything else unaffected.
I don't want to get into this too much as I am biased, but I can ensure you
that stability-wise, Linux beats the pants off of any Windows system I've
ever seen. My server goes months without reboots, and even then it's because
I've rebooted to a new kernel or upgrading hardware. My workstation also
stays up for months and I'm constantly running lots of different things, as
well as experimenting with all sorts of different software.
Cheers.
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 19:15:38 -0500
Reply-To: HPLX Mailing List ,
Karl Vanderhaven
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Karl Vanderhaven
Subject: FLUFF: Re: HP in the news
KenLondon wrote:
> I know of several companies who tried linux on their systems and have
> ended up with huge bills for customer service to straighten things
> out, some of these individuals are very tech savy and have had lots of
> problems. For them linux was the biggest mistake of their lives.
Sorry but if they had to call customer support, they were not tech "savy".
Linux like any Unix is a good test, to find out if a person is actually as
good with computers as they would like to think they are.
> I would point out that the world needs an operating system that is
> better than Windoze (it has...it is called DOS). Beyond DOS, I wish
> their was an alternative, linux does not appear to be it.
Sigh .. please Ken, take the time to actually learn about a subject
before posting it to a public forum. This is a chronic problem, of
yours. First D&A insult, your ridiculous and repeated false claim to being
misquoted dozens of times, your extremely rude "Who or what is a Daniel
Legendre" comment, and now totally ignorant rantings of Linux. If you do
not have anything of importance to say please do not feel obligated to
post. Also for the sake of God learn how to properly do a FLUFF: header.
Just putting "Fluff" as the first word is _not_ good enough. Sorry to be
harsh but you have posted one too many nonsense things.
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 07:49:17 +0100
Reply-To: HPLX Mailing List ,
Tamas Feher
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Tamas Feher
Subject: Fluff: Re: Minix (Linux) on the palmtop.
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Hello all,
Minix can access DOS filesystems, there are
DOSdir/DOSread/DOSwrite commands.
Minix could also network, but it simply cannot fit in XT/640kb.
Andy Tanenbaum not only wrote Minix and Aemoba OSes, but
also the legendary book on "Computer Networks". He got mad at
St. Linus because Linux is sustaining an obsolete kind of OS with
monolithic kernel. But I think he was wrong. Not only Linux is
obsolete, but also any microkernel (Mach based) Unix should be
history, too. The whole idea of file-based OS concept (everything is
file in Unix) makes it inherentrly unsafe, virus-prone, unreliable.
There will be a plethora of Unix-viruses soon. You can make any
file a program, because the program is just a file in Unix, so there
is nothing really prohibiting malware from Unix.
The future should be OO-based OSes, with inherent unbreakable
security and extreme reliability. These (like OS/400) are here and
been here for over 15years and they are driving the mini and
mainframe machines of Fortune500, etc. Some day hopefully PC
users will come to expect the same kind of reliability and security
from the desktops.
I would be happy even if only the VMS became available for IBM
PC. In early 90's DEC made it; up to a bost-alpha test release and
then it was abandoned. Why the damn hell can't Compaq release it
into public domain for finishing development, at least for edu
purposes?
Sincerely: Tamas Feher.
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 02:21:28 -0600
Reply-To: HPLX Mailing List ,
hap_py family
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: hap_py family
Subject: Re: OBD Scan Tool
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html
Check out the following... It will not work for the LX, but will work on any Win95/3.1 notebook. This product gives you a great deal of information about car codes, and general diagnostic information. www.obd-2.com
Alan
>From: "Robert K. Meyer"
>Reply-To: HPLX Mailing List , "Robert K. Meyer"
>To: HPLX-L@UCONNVM.UConn.Edu
>Subject: OBD Scan Tool
>Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2001 20:35:55 -0700
>
>Does anyone have any recommendations for OBD I/II scan
>tools? Most desireable would include DOS software/interface
>that would run on the LX.
>
>Bob
>--
>R.K. Meyer MSEE K7PPC bmeyer@union-tel.com Elk Mountain WY
>http://w3.union-tel.com/~bmeyer/ The stone... Psa 118:22
>
>** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
>
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 05:07:38 -0500
Reply-To: HPLX Mailing List ,
Martin Bergvill
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Martin Bergvill
Subject: Re: Fluff HP in the news
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
On Wed, 28 Feb 2001 17:48:15 +0100, Michael Berrier wrote:
Michael
> I really don't understand the discussion, here on the list. The point is
> that all LX-user are waiting desperately for a really alternative to our
> old 200LX,
I am not waiting for a alternative. I am okey with it as it is. I will
get some more memory soon, but beside from that I am okey with the
unit. I do not lack anything.
> we only have small improvement we are waiting for. I don't care
> what system will be choosen I 'm waiting for the update LX, nothing else.
I am also waiting for a update Lx. But that will be a _updated_ _lx_
:-)
Regards
--
___
Mar|in Bergvill ,Narvik Norway
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 05:07:40 -0500
Reply-To: HPLX Mailing List ,
Martin Bergvill
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Martin Bergvill
Subject: Re: HP in the news
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
On Wed, 28 Feb 2001 09:42:04 -0500, Ed Padin wrote:
Ed Padin
(Not fluffed in subject because it is Hplx related)
> My experince with Linux is that it is very powerful but can also be more
> difficult to use.
I installed Red Hat on my desktop computer. It was fun playing with it.
But my world is sad to say a "windowz" world.
> A linux based PDA would be nice for techy types but,
> unless they put a easily navigable front-end user interface with some useful
> applications, it will remain a hobbyists toy.
I feel that that could be said about the Hplx too. Yes it has the
Application manager and all the built in applications. But if you
really are _in to_ the Hplx you are a "configuration junkie"
To get to the level of Hplx knowledge I am at now I have read a lot of
docs and tweaked a lot of config files. That is _not_ something
anybody will do today.
Reading a lot of docs and tweaking of cfg's is not necassery a bad
thing. But from a market point of view it seems that the market want a
"plug and play" os that is not hard to use.
When my dad wanted a "Filofax that beeps" I could not get myself to buy
him a Hplx. It is too techie. I bought him a Psion 5Mx which has more
of the synch things he needs.
But for me the Hplx is the best machine out there. Even though it is a
"Hplx on steroids" (As Owen in the sailboat calls it :-)
Regards
--
___
Mar|in Bergvill ,Narvik Norway
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 05:07:42 -0500
Reply-To: HPLX Mailing List ,
Martin Bergvill
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Martin Bergvill
Subject: Re: FLUFF: Re: HP in the news
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
On Thu, 1 Mar 2001 02:20:08 +0100, Owen H. Morgan wrote:
Owen
> Hi
>
> If the object of this discussion is finding a suitable OS for the next generation of HP palmtops, aren't y'all forgetting something important?
I see that you a are still "pushing" Epoc..:-) Thats okey I will
probably end up with a epoc device some time in the future (not for
many years though!!)
>Still, it leaves me in the sad position where I now own a WindoZe
> notebook simply to use as a ZIP-drive interface for my palmtop and
> camera.
If we can get some more info from the zip vs Hplx guy you could maybe
throw out your laptop and use the Hplx for zip drive access :-)
>I do _ALL_ my serious computing on the palmtop.
"Palmtop" as in "Hplx" or "Palmtop" as in "Mc218"? :-)
> Owen
> --
> On a sailboat. In Norway writing this e-mail on my palmtop while the
> Web application is busy downloading a software upgrade (via cell phone)
> in the background. I also have a total of 11 other open applications.
> Can you do _THAT_ on your LX?
I have one mind and need just one application at a time, but soon I
have a SC DS 64mb Hplx.. Then I maybe could do what you do but do I
need to do it?
> Oh, and in case you wondered, the OS is called EPOC and is found on
> Psion, Ericsson and Nokia palmtops amongst others.
Yes I already guessed :-). Nokia has Epoc on their 9000 (Geos??) and
9110 soon the 9210 _phones_ with pim cabability . But they are _not_
palmtops.
> In a world without walls and fences,
> who needs windows and gates?
Nice one. But I just have to point out one thing. You have this
advanced epoc Os but you can not get the line length down to the
required length which I can with this "outdated dying machine" running
Www/lx. :-))
(Yes when I read the message my mailprogram wraps the lines and
everything is okey, but when I reply your lines are _very_ long)
(Owen I am just pulling you leg :-))
Regards
About 200km from you and your sailboat :-)
--
___
Mar|in Bergvill , Narvik Norway
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 05:07:44 -0500
Reply-To: HPLX Mailing List ,
Martin Bergvill
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Martin Bergvill
Subject: Re: FLUFF: Re: HP in the news
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
On Wed, 28 Feb 2001 18:21:41 -0700, Richard and Patti Smith wrote:
Richard
> Oh, my goodness...
> What have I started...?
>
> Richard Smith
> (With echoes of "Linux sucks!" "No, Windows sucks!" "NO, YOU
> SUCK!" and fistfights, in the background...)
Yes what have you started now?..:-)
Richard you can be sure that I will join you "ringside" and not be part
of the fistfight :-)) (I hope it does not get to a fistfight though)
Regards
--
___
Mar|in Bergvill ,Narvik Norway
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 11:17:52 +0100
Reply-To: HPLX Mailing List ,
Laust Brock-Nannestad
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Laust Brock-Nannestad
Subject: Re: FLUFF: Re: Minix (Linux) on the palmtop.
In-Reply-To: <3A9F507D.13091.404324@localhost>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
On Fri, 2 Mar 2001, Tamas Feher wrote:
> Andy Tanenbaum not only wrote Minix and Aemoba OSes, but
> also the legendary book on "Computer Networks". He got mad at
> St. Linus because Linux is sustaining an obsolete kind of OS with
> monolithic kernel. But I think he was wrong. Not only Linux is
> obsolete, but also any microkernel (Mach based) Unix should be
> history, too. The whole idea of file-based OS concept (everything is
> file in Unix) makes it inherentrly unsafe, virus-prone, unreliable.
> There will be a plethora of Unix-viruses soon. You can make any
> file a program, because the program is just a file in Unix, so there
> is nothing really prohibiting malware from Unix.
Yawn. People have been predicting that UNIX would be flooded with viruses
"real soon now" for the last ten years. It still hasn't happened. That is
not to say that UNIX is invulnerable, it isn't, but unless a user has or
gains root access because of an exploit (which are generally quickly
fixed, I might add, at least on GNU/Linux based systems), he/she will only
be able to delete his/her own files, and not harm will be done to the
system or other users. As for configuration based on files, I don't see
the problem. It's easy to use, it's flexible, and under UNIX these files
are protected by file permissions (which are quite powerful). There are
even patches for Linux available that will protect essential system files
from being edited, _even by the administrator_, unless you reboot the
machine with a special parameter. This greatly increases security (not
even a root-exploit will help), at the cost of flexibility of course.
As for Mach, I don't see any problems, or with microkernels in general.
The Mach kernel is only tied to UNIX because it is useful, you could use
Mach to run other OSes as well. In fact, it only runs BSD UNIX processes
in "user-mode servers" (there is no BSD UNIX code in the kernel), a
concept much like the "virtual machines" that IBM use in their mainframe
OSes. This is good for security (and flexible, too).
> The future should be OO-based OSes, with inherent unbreakable
> security and extreme reliability. These (like OS/400) are here and
> been here for over 15years and they are driving the mini and
> mainframe machines of Fortune500, etc. Some day hopefully PC
> users will come to expect the same kind of reliability and security
> from the desktops.
PC users will probably expect the same kind of reliablity when the
hardware is as reliable - error correcting memory (and "no-name memory",
as used in many PCs would be out of the question of course!), RAIDed
harddrives, redundant power supplies, etc.. Do you see that happening on
the desktop market any time soon? I don't.
Cheers,
Laust
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 12:02:37 +0100
Reply-To: HPLX Mailing List ,
Laust Brock-Nannestad
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Laust Brock-Nannestad
Subject: FLUFF: Re: HP in the news
In-Reply-To: <3A9F0EF2.C6ACAF5B@beld.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
On Thu, 1 Mar 2001, Ken London wrote:
> If won't run on the 200lx it is no better than DOS. What good is it?
This is a very narrow-minded view, but from the perspective of a 200LX
user that uses _nothing_ else, it's true that Linux would be useless. That
doesn't necessarily make Linux a failure.
To me it looks like you're getting the usefulness of a product (for want
of a better word) confused with its success-rate or quality. Either that
or you're trolling...
I'm sure Linux would run well on your Windows 98 machine.
Cheers,
Laust
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 06:10:02 -0600
Reply-To: HPLX Mailing List ,
Kelly McMillin
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Kelly McMillin
Subject: Does Flash Ram lose everything when you remove it?
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I have a flash ram card that I wanted to transfer between two pocket PCs. =
Do I lose the stuff on it when I remove it?
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 06:09:24 -0800
Reply-To: HPLX Mailing List ,
Longden_Loo@CANDLE.COM
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Longden Loo
Subject: Re: Does Flash Ram lose everything when you remove it?
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> I have a flash ram card that I wanted to transfer between two pocket PCs.
Do I
> lose the stuff on it when I remove it?
Not with any flash ram cards that I know of.
Whatever you write to the card generally stays there till you take it off
(unless it sits for a couple of years).
- Longden
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 09:57:37 -0500
Reply-To: HPLX Mailing List ,
Steve
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Steve
Subject: Re: IR x-fer LX <-->OB800
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Thanks to Andrew Lovell, Mike Koppin, Al, and Longden.
for the URL's, interesting sites, tips, and help.
I now know why the other Omnibooks were more expensive.
I just got the Omnibook and the charger. And Win 98
is probably not appropriate for the machine, as it is
somewhat slow, bloated, and quite unstable. If I had
the floppy, original software, or the CD-ROM drive I
probably would have a different OS on it by now.
Thanks again,
Steve
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 10:21:58 -0500
Reply-To: HPLX Mailing List ,
Ken London
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Ken London
Subject: Re: Fluff: Re: Minix (Linux) on the palmtop.
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Tamas Feher wrote:
> I would be happy even if only the VMS became available for IBM
> PC. In early 90's DEC made it; up to a bost-alpha test release and
> then it was abandoned. Why the damn hell can't Compaq release it
> into public domain for finishing development, at least for edu
> purposes?
>
VMS was not made in the 90s, I was using it in the 70s on a VAX 11.
You would not want it on a PC, it was very buggy, crashed alot, and
was very expensive. This was from DEC long before compaq.
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 09:44:46 -0600
Reply-To: Chris Lott
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Chris Lott
Subject: Re: Fluff: Re: Minix (Linux) on the palmtop.
In-Reply-To: <3A9FBA96.2F49E93E@beld.net> from "Ken London" at Mar 02,
2001 10:21:58 AM
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> > I would be happy even if only the VMS became available for IBM
> > PC. In early 90's DEC made it; up to a bost-alpha test release and
> > then it was abandoned. Why the damn hell can't Compaq release it
> > into public domain for finishing development, at least for edu
> > purposes?
> >
>
> VMS was not made in the 90s, I was using it in the 70s on a VAX 11.
> You would not want it on a PC, it was very buggy, crashed alot, and
> was very expensive. This was from DEC long before compaq.
I can't comment on the VMS OS on a PC per-se, but I would *love* to
have the DEC VMS command line interpreter available for a PC. That was
one of my favorites. I was just discussing yesterday with my business
partner why we don't hear much about replacement command.com command
line interpreters being, or having been, available for DOS...
-Chris Lott
--
************************************************************************
R. Christopher Lott, P.E. rclott@ro.com
Alpha Beta Technologies, Inc.
3112 12th Ave S.W. PHONE: 256-534-9067
Huntsville, Alabama 35805 FAX: 256-534-9069
************************************************************************
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 08:45:42 -0700
Reply-To: HPLX Mailing List ,
"Feldman, Robert"
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: "Feldman, Robert"
Subject: FLUFF: RE: Fluff: Re: Minix (Linux) on the palmtop.
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Ken,
Please take the time to read the posts you reply to. Tamas was not saying
that VMS, per se, was developed in the 90's, but that a version for the PC
was in development then, that it got to a post-alpha stage, and that further
development was stopped.
Can we let this thread die now? (Sorry to keep it alive with my own post,
but the aggravation level is rising.)
Bob Feldman
-----Original Message-----
From: Ken London İmailto:KenLondon@BELD.NET¨
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2001 9:22 AM
To: HPLX-L@UCONNVM.UCONN.EDU
Subject: Re: Fluff: Re: Minix (Linux) on the palmtop.
Tamas Feher wrote:
> I would be happy even if only the VMS became available for IBM
> PC. In early 90's DEC made it; up to a bost-alpha test release and
> then it was abandoned. Why the damn hell can't Compaq release it
> into public domain for finishing development, at least for edu
> purposes?
>
VMS was not made in the 90s, I was using it in the 70s on a VAX 11.
You would not want it on a PC, it was very buggy, crashed alot, and
was very expensive. This was from DEC long before compaq.
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 11:41:38 -0500
Reply-To: HPLX Mailing List ,
MCHEM1@UCONNVM.UCONN.EDU
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Al Kind
Subject: Re: FLUFF: Re: HP in the news
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Fri, 2 Mar 2001 11:32:48 -0500 (EST)
FYI: correct URL is http://www.newdealinc.com
Cheers...AJKind
20h20m31s ago ...
On Thu, 1 Mar 2001, Tony Kan wrote:
> Geos has been resurrected as NewDeal (see www.newdeal.com)...
--
* Al Kind, 3113 Horsebarn Rd U-193, Storrs CT 06269-4193 USA
* Phone:(860)486-6126 EFax:(413)826-8780 **TeamHP200LX**
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 10:42:11 +0200
Reply-To: davidb@netmedia.net.il
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: David Becher
Subject: Re: ANN:PNR v4.0 and PAL ASSEMBLY LANGUAGE SUPPLEMENT
Barry writes:
> > David Becher Announced:
> >
> > PAL ASSEMBLY LANGUGAE SUPPLEMENT
> Did you determine how much space you saved doing this?
No, but this and some other tricks let me reduce PNR in size to the extent that
I could add MIME support to it, whereas before it was hitting the 64k code
limit of the small memory model. Dont forget that also a lot of run time
library code can be removed from the executable if you dont use it! For
example, the code of the int86x function calls.
An intersting test (which I didnt do) would be to take a simple program which
justs displays a dialog or something and build it under each version.
--
** David Becher
** davidb@netmedia.net.il davidb@cimatron.co.il
** www.cimatron.co.il
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 07:58:45 +0200
Reply-To: davidb@netmedia.net.il
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: David Becher
Subject: Re: FLUFF: Re: HP in the news
Owen H. Morgan writes:
İmajor snip¨
> Oh, and in case you wondered, the OS is called EPOC and is found on Psion, Ericsson and Nokia palmtops amongst others.
I tend to agree with Owen regarding EPOC as a mature operating system for
handheld computers. The main reason while I am still with my trusty HPLX is that
I dont like the PSION HARDWARE.* I find the keyboard uncomfortable and I dislike
thet fact that the screen opens to only a fixed angle. But this is my PERSONAL
preference. If and when my HPLX dies, an EPOC machine will be my next palmtop.
(* I also have a lot of fun programming on the HPLX)
--
** David Becher
** davidb@netmedia.net.il davidb@cimatron.co.il
** www.cimatron.co.il
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 17:55:21 +0100
Reply-To: HPLX Mailing List ,
Laust Brock-Nannestad
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Laust Brock-Nannestad
Subject: Re: Fluff: Re: Minix (Linux) on the palmtop.
In-Reply-To: <200103021544.f22Fiku09114@mail.hiwaay.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
On Fri, 2 Mar 2001, Chris Lott wrote:
> I can't comment on the VMS OS on a PC per-se, but I would *love* to
> have the DEC VMS command line interpreter available for a PC. That was
> one of my favorites. I was just discussing yesterday with my business
> partner why we don't hear much about replacement command.com command
> line interpreters being, or having been, available for DOS...
They do exist... There's 4DOS, www.jpsoft.com, which works well on the LX
(even better if you have Expanded memory available). There's also a
freeware Korn Shell implementation that works too. Configuring it takes a
bit of time, though.
I think that what might keep your dream shell away from DOS (even if
someone sat down and tried to port/clone it) is the limits imposed by DOS,
such as the 127 (or 255?) char limit on the size of a command line, the
way DOS handles pipes, no concurrent processes, etc. This pretty much
rules out shell expansion of file patterns for instance, unless you have
very few files, and many of the "cool" things you'd do in a UNIX shell are
best done concurrent processes.
The Mortice-Kern-Systems Toolkit also came with a Korn shell, and I
believe they devised a way of allowing the shell to expand file patterns
and pass the command line on to the program being run, but without hitting
the MS-DOS command line limit (probably used a temporary file). Of course,
their method only worked with their own tools, or the (few) external
programs that were written to support it. This is another problem, the
many already exisiting DOS programs that would be confused if the command
line interpreter acted differently (again, pattern expansion is a good
example).
Old versions of the MKS toolkit also work great on the LX, but you will
probably have a hard time finding them. For the freeware Korn shell,
Simtel should have it. Simtel also has a number of other, more or less
complete, shells.
Cheers,
Laust
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 11:57:05 -0500
Reply-To: HPLX Mailing List ,
Lars Hedstroem
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Lars Hedstroem
Subject: NG:s
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi
Is it posssible to use 8-bit instead of quoted-printable when
you read NG:s with PLUS?
Lars
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 18:06:08 +0100
Reply-To: "Owen H. Morgan"
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: "Owen H. Morgan"
Subject: Auto switch off. Something strange is going on.
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Howdy.
I seem to remember that when I first started messing about with the LX, I =
couldn't get it to timeout and switch itself off for love nor money if it =
was connected to external power. Now it suddenly does. In fact, I had to =
put "LXSTAT T 0" in the batch file that runs my weatherfax software to =
avoid it switching off when it was idle between scheduled times. Is my =
memory playing tricks on me?
I've checked with LXSTAT, and the LX knows that it has external power. =
Anyway, the batteries would have been flat by now if the external power =
didn't work..
Owen
--
On a sailboat. In Norway
http://pagina.de/naomi.j=
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 12:26:42 -0500
Reply-To: HPLX Mailing List ,
Ed Padin
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Ed Padin
Subject: Re: Fluff: Re: Minix (Linux) on the palmtop.
Comments: To: Laust Brock-Nannestad
There's a port of a bash-shell-like program for the palmtop that works well.
I forget where I got it but I know it works well. You can write shell
scripts as well.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Laust Brock-Nannestad"
To:
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2001 11:55 AM
Subject: Re: Fluff: Re: Minix (Linux) on the palmtop.
> On Fri, 2 Mar 2001, Chris Lott wrote:
>
> > I can't comment on the VMS OS on a PC per-se, but I would *love* to
> > have the DEC VMS command line interpreter available for a PC. That was
> > one of my favorites. I was just discussing yesterday with my business
> > partner why we don't hear much about replacement command.com command
> > line interpreters being, or having been, available for DOS...
>
> They do exist... There's 4DOS, www.jpsoft.com, which works well on the LX
> (even better if you have Expanded memory available). There's also a
> freeware Korn Shell implementation that works too. Configuring it takes a
> bit of time, though.
>
> I think that what might keep your dream shell away from DOS (even if
> someone sat down and tried to port/clone it) is the limits imposed by DOS,
> such as the 127 (or 255?) char limit on the size of a command line, the
> way DOS handles pipes, no concurrent processes, etc. This pretty much
> rules out shell expansion of file patterns for instance, unless you have
> very few files, and many of the "cool" things you'd do in a UNIX shell are
> best done concurrent processes.
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 11:24:16 -0600
Reply-To: HPLX Mailing List ,
Barry
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Barry
Subject: Re: PALMPC contra PALRUN
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Stefan Peichl wrote:
>
> However on my desktop QWERTZ keyboard,
> the scancode of Z is 15 hex, which is more
> correct because it is exactly it's location on
> the keyboard.
What is a QWERTZ keyboard? Obviously it's a different
arrangement but I've never heard of this. Where and when and
why is that used?
Barry
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 12:30:56 -0500
Reply-To: HPLX Mailing List ,
Ed Padin
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Ed Padin
Subject: Geos on the HP200LX
I had GEOS on there at one point. it works but I did not find it useful.
> If I recall correctly, Tony Hutchings was running Geos on his
> hplx during the time of the old list. After the new list got
> started, he didn't seem to show his face around here much
> anymore. But if he is around, he is your man for Geos on the
> hplx.
>
> Domingo
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 12:51:35 -0500
Reply-To: HPLX Mailing List ,
Ed Padin
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Ed Padin
Subject: FLUFF: Re: HP in the news
Yeah, anything that doesn't run on the 200LX is crap! I tried to inserted a
Nintendo cartridge in my LX and it didn't work.. crap! I then put a raw
hamburger on the keyboard and closed the keyboard ( ala 'George Foreman'
griil) but the burger would not cook. I guess the beef was crap. I then
tried to speak commands into my LX and it didn't respond... I guess the
English language is also crap (I haven't tried other languages.)
BTW:
Since this thread seems to be more about stupid inflamatory statements than
anything else, here's my contrinution:
All religions suck!!!
USA #1 !!!
American Cars are the best!!!
Anyone who is 'Pro-Choice' is an idiot !!!
Creationism is more accurate than evolution!!
Rock and Roll sucks!!
My operating system is better then you operating system!!
GW Bush stole the election!!
Microsoft is innocent!!
All women are bitches!!
My dad can beat up your dad!!
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ken London"
To:
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2001 10:09 PM
Subject: Re: HP in the news
> People keep saying how great Linux is. As far as I can tell it is a
> miserable
> failure because it can't run on the 200lx. That makes it no better than
> DOS.
> Windoze can't run on the 200lx either, but very few people are saying
> how
> great windoze is. So if linux is a failiure on the 200lx, what good is
> it?
>
> If won't run on the 200lx it is no better than DOS. What good is it?
>
> ** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 13:23:57 -0500
Reply-To: HPLX Mailing List ,
Lars Hedstroem
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Lars Hedstroem
Subject: Re: NG:s
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
I wrote:
> Hi
>
> Is it posssible to use 8-bit instead of quoted-printable when
> you read NG:s with PLUS?
>
I found how to toggle, I made the ordinary mistake to first
ask then look in the helpfiles
Lars
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 19:44:09 +0100
Reply-To: HPLX Mailing List ,
Laust Brock-Nannestad
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Laust Brock-Nannestad
Subject: Re: Fluff: Re: Minix (Linux) on the palmtop.
In-Reply-To: <012401c0a33d$f268c960$0200a8c0@openreach.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
On Fri, 2 Mar 2001, Ed Padin wrote:
> There's a port of a bash-shell-like program for the palmtop that works
> well. I forget where I got it but I know it works well. You can write
> shell scripts as well.
That's probably the Korn Shell I mentioned. Very configurable, but a bit
slow on a stock LX without any Expanded Memory (the .exe file is 200kb+,
which needs to be swapped out for running DOS programs...)
For anyone interested, the shell can be found here:
ftp://garbo.uwasa.fi/pc/unix/ms_sh23b.zip
(800kb download!)
I tried finding it on Simtel, but the new Simtel design/layout didn't
strike me as very useful...
Cheers,
Laust
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 11:51:02 -0600
Reply-To: HPLX Mailing List ,
Barry
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Barry
Subject: Re: Linux vs Palm vs 200LX, was: HP in the news
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Daniel Hertrich wrote:
>
> And at last, to become on-topic, it is
> NOT possible to run any kind of linux
> on the 200LX, since Linux needs at
> least a 386. Minix on the LX is too
> limited to be useful in my opinion. So
> we have to wait for the Morphy one,
> buy a Toshiba Libretto-like machine or
> carry a full-sized notebook to run linux
> on the road.
I used to have a Radio Shack Color Computer with 64k and a
single 160k floppy drive. That was it. No hard drive.
I had an OS for it called OS-9, made by Microware. It was
basically a tiny but very clever and useful subset of unix, with
a few changes to accomodate it's size. The system used 22k ram.
The rest was available for programs. Some commands were disk
resident but the entire system only took up about 80k on a disk
if you didn't have all the configuration tools on it. That did
include the assembler, debugger and editor (vi-like).
It used premptive multitasking. The ampersand would run a
background task just as in unix. You could connect a terminal
to the serial port and have 2 users. We once found a way to
connect 3 users and it all ran fine.
It didn't have virtual memory, but since it was really a single
user system and most apps were small, and built in small
modules, that wasn't really needed.
Oh yeah, there was also a GUI for it later, although this was
before the name GUI was known. It was before the first Mac hit
the market. The Lisa might have been out then. I'm not sure.
I think it was called Multi-view. I think it used up 8k more
ram. Never having seen or heard of a GUI before I thought this
was a silly idea that would never fly. :)
Even though this was a very small subset of unix, it was a very
powerful and flexible and highly configurable OS. I'm still
amazed that they packed so much into so little space. The
whole thing was written in assembly.
It wouldn't be hard to develop a system on the 200lx like this.
It could leave more memory and disk space for the user than the
Dos does, even though Dos is in ROM.
I'm not actually suggesting that we do this. I can't see any
use for it except as a toy to play with. But it really might be
a lot of fun to play with something like that.
Barry
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 20:45:07 +0100
Reply-To: HPLX Mailing List , BOCHE@DE.IBM.COM
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Ulrich Boche
Subject: Re: Keyborads. Was:PALMPC contra PALRUN
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Friday, 02.03.2001 at 17:24 GMT, Barry wrote:
> What is a QWERTZ keyboard? Obviously it's a different
> arrangement but I've never heard of this. Where and when and
> why is that used?
>
The QWERTZ keyboard is the German keyboard.
It has the Y and Z reversed (the Y is rarely used in German,
but we have a lot of Zs).
BTW. The French keyboard is called AZERTY. It is hard to handle for
someone not used to it because it has a lot more characters exchanged.
Ulrich Boche
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 14:49:26 -0500
Reply-To: HPLX Mailing List ,
Ken Hansen
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Ken Hansen
Subject: Re: Linux vs Palm vs 200LX, was: HP in the news
Comments: To: Barry
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
OS 9 <> Linux <> Unix
OS 9 was an advanced OS (for the time) *designed* for limited hardware in
common use.
Linux is an advanced OS *designed* for Linus's powerful 80386-based PC,
modeled after Unix..
Unix was an advanced OS designed for advanced hardware (PDP-11, ported onto
almost everything that was sufficiently robust).
Linux is *defined* by the kernel. Some refer to it as Gnj/Linux, since most
of the software included with Linux is from the GNU project (GNU -= GNU's
Not Unix, don't get me started).
To rewrite (different from port) the kernel to support the 80186 CPU would
be to create a new kernel, not Linux.
Is this clear? Sorry, best I could do.
OS 9 was designed for the 6809 CPU - a much different beastie from the Intel
family of CPUs.
Ken
----- Original Message -----
From: "Barry"
To:
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2001 12:51 PM
Subject: Re: Linux vs Palm vs 200LX, was: HP in the news
> > Daniel Hertrich wrote:
> >
> > And at last, to become on-topic, it is
> > NOT possible to run any kind of linux
> > on the 200LX, since Linux needs at
> > least a 386. Minix on the LX is too
> > limited to be useful in my opinion. So
> > we have to wait for the Morphy one,
> > buy a Toshiba Libretto-like machine or
> > carry a full-sized notebook to run linux
> > on the road.
>
> I used to have a Radio Shack Color Computer with 64k and a
> single 160k floppy drive. That was it. No hard drive.
>
> I had an OS for it called OS-9, made by Microware. It was
> basically a tiny but very clever and useful subset of unix, with
> a few changes to accomodate it's size. The system used 22k ram.
> The rest was available for programs. Some commands were disk
> resident but the entire system only took up about 80k on a disk
> if you didn't have all the configuration tools on it. That did
> include the assembler, debugger and editor (vi-like).
>
> It used premptive multitasking. The ampersand would run a
> background task just as in unix. You could connect a terminal
> to the serial port and have 2 users. We once found a way to
> connect 3 users and it all ran fine.
>
> It didn't have virtual memory, but since it was really a single
> user system and most apps were small, and built in small
> modules, that wasn't really needed.
>
> Oh yeah, there was also a GUI for it later, although this was
> before the name GUI was known. It was before the first Mac hit
> the market. The Lisa might have been out then. I'm not sure.
> I think it was called Multi-view. I think it used up 8k more
> ram. Never having seen or heard of a GUI before I thought this
> was a silly idea that would never fly. :)
>
> Even though this was a very small subset of unix, it was a very
> powerful and flexible and highly configurable OS. I'm still
> amazed that they packed so much into so little space. The
> whole thing was written in assembly.
>
> It wouldn't be hard to develop a system on the 200lx like this.
> It could leave more memory and disk space for the user than the
> Dos does, even though Dos is in ROM.
>
> I'm not actually suggesting that we do this. I can't see any
> use for it except as a toy to play with. But it really might be
> a lot of fun to play with something like that.
>
> Barry
>
> ** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
>
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 14:57:30 -0500
Reply-To: HPLX Mailing List ,
Larry Tachna
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Larry Tachna
Subject: Re: FLUFF: Re: HP in the news
Comments: To: Ed Padin
In-Reply-To: <013c01c0a341$6ff60610$0200a8c0@openreach.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>>My dad can beat up your dad!!
that says it all right there now everyone go to timeout for 2 days!
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 12:04:31 -0600
Reply-To: HPLX Mailing List ,
Barry
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Barry
Subject: Re: HP in the news İFLUFF¨
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Ken London wrote:
>
> Can it really be that good an operating
> system if it won't run on the 200lx?
I love that logic. I guess that means we can scrap Win2k,
Win98, NT, MacOS, unix, MVS and all those other silly OSes.
That will leave the world with Dos and a form of CP/M. The
world doesn't need a computer with more than 640k RAM anyway.
That will also let us get rid of the expensive internet and go
back to a system of BBSs that pass mail around after midnight.
I may still have one of my old 300 baud modems.
Barry
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 11:54:31 -0800
Reply-To: HPLX Mailing List ,
"Peter A. Castro"
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: "Peter A. Castro"
Subject: Re: Fluff: Re: Minix (Linux) on the palmtop.
Comments: To: Ken London
In-Reply-To: <3A9FBA96.2F49E93E@beld.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
On Fri, 2 Mar 2001, Ken London wrote:
> Tamas Feher wrote:
>
> > I would be happy even if only the VMS became available for IBM
> > PC. In early 90's DEC made it; up to a bost-alpha test release and
> > then it was abandoned. Why the damn hell can't Compaq release it
> > into public domain for finishing development, at least for edu
> > purposes?
>
> VMS was not made in the 90s, I was using it in the 70s on a VAX 11.
> You would not want it on a PC, it was very buggy, crashed alot, and
> was very expensive. This was from DEC long before compaq.
OK, *now* I know you're trolling, Ken. I did network apps development on
the platform for 5 years. It was quite stable and had some really great
features (eg: Clustering). Most likely, the only think that crashed on
VMS was your applications, not the system. I'll grant you VMS was very
large and expensive, but everything from DEC was :-)
(To everyone else, my appologies for the waste of bandwidth)
--
Peter A. Castro or
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 21:35:16 +0000
Reply-To: remce@gofree.indigo.ie
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: "Richard E. McEvoy"
Subject: Re: More info on corrupt, password-protected notes file
Comments: To: Longden_Loo@CANDLE.COM
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
My problem (see earlier posting) was very like Jeffreys. The only
difference was I never had a password, but it kept asking for one. I
got "invalid file type" on the other DBase programs and "unable to open"
on the phone.pdb. It was solved when my.env and .ini files were right.It
froze several times and Ctrl shift on was required on some of these.
BTW,You will not be able to open notes if you delete the .env file and
LEAVE THE NOTES.NDB INTACT. I have just tried this in my effort to
reproduce my earlier problem. I deleted the note.env file and got
"cannot open file", but it did not produce the lockup I had earlier.
Probably because this time I only deleted one .env and no .ini. IMHO it
is a problem with the .envs and .ini files, since everything is working
perfectly now on my 5mb LX (The 32mb is on its way back from Thaddeus)
:-))
HTH
Richard
Longden Loo wrote:
> > It looks like the problem started when I tried to change the password
> from
> > one password to another. I tried it again on a copy of my backup and it
> > corrupted the backup copy. I restored it again and changed the password
> > to nothing, closed and reopened the file, and then set the new password.
> > That seemed to work.
>
> FWIW, I wasn't able to reproduce the problem on my 6mb/2x 200LX. I quit
> NoteTaker, deleted notes.env and notes.ndb and reopened Notetaker ... got
> the welcome screen and a blank notes.ndb which I added one entry and
> password protected.
>
>
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 23:03:16 +0200
Reply-To: HPLX Mailing List ,
Daniel Hertrich
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Daniel Hertrich
Subject: Re: FLUFF: Re: Linux vs Palm vs 200LX, was: HP in the news
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Hi Adrian and friends,
On Fri, 2 Mar 2001 11:17:34 +0800 (SGT), Adrian Ho wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Mar 2001, Daniel Hertrich wrote:
>
> > Actually, I didn't want to chime in that fluff thread, but
> > now I can't stand all that crap about linux anymore ;-)
>
> İ...¨
> Conclusions (both positive and negative) based on _other_
> people's opinions, and without personal experience, are another
> matter entirely. I wouldn't call them "crap" either, but I'm
> not sure what term to use. "Misguided", perhaps?
You're right, of course. I'm sorry if anyone here felt offended by my
words. Personal opinions are not crap, that's for sure.
What I meant with crap was what a few people here said about Linux
that's definitely wrong, for example that it is in general less stable
than Windows and such things.
Of course it _can_ be less stable, but if it is, you probably have
misconfigured something.
GTX
daniel
--
Celia & Daniel Hertrich d.hertrich@gmx.de
home page: http://www.daniel-hertrich.de
mobile phone: +49 (0)177 7955549
unified messaging (fax,voice): +49 (0)721 151 306690
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 16:14:16 -0600
Reply-To: HPLX Mailing List ,
Evan Person
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Evan Person
Subject: Re: IKEA batteries
Comments: To: Daniel Hertrich
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Daniel Hertrich wrote:
> i'm sorry - the IKEA batteries are really yellow now.
> (but they WERE green/gray, I swear! ;-) )
> Yesterday I bought 10 AAs for 5 DM (2.5 US$). "Produced by Varta for
> IKEA" is written on them. The product description says "MN1500". Does
> that say something about capacity??
>
> Nice cheap batteries - makes me considering replacing the rechargeables
> by these batteries in daily use...
The IKEA in Chicago sells both the yellow
batteries and the green/gray batteries. If
you read the fine print you will see that the
yellow batteries are made in Germany by
Varta, and the gray/green batteries are made
in China. The price is the same for both,
US$1.95 for a pack of 10. I bought a few
of both to try.
Evan
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 17:36:44 -0500
Reply-To: HPLX Mailing List ,
KenLondon
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: KenLondon
Subject: Re: Fluff: Re: Minix (Linux) on the palmtop.
Comments: To: "Peter A. Castro"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
"Peter A. Castro" wrote:
> OK, *now* I know you're trolling, Ken. I did network apps development on
> the platform for 5 years. It was quite stable and had some really great
> features (eg: Clustering). Most likely, the only think that crashed on
> VMS was your applications, not the system. I'll grant you VMS was very
> large and expensive, but everything from DEC was :-)
In general the entire system crashed very often, Many times when I had no
applications running.
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2001 00:06:05 +0100
Reply-To: HPLX Mailing List ,
Winfried Zettelmeyer
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Winfried Zettelmeyer
Subject: Re: Another 123 question
Comments: To: Barry
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Dear Barry,
I wrote to the list about three weeks ago,
>> With a macro, I want to Xtract a range from
>> a worksheet and save it to a file WITH A NAME
>> CONTAINED IN ONE OF THE CELLS.....
>>
>> Question: Can I substitute the question mark
>> after /fsv which pauses the macro to allow the
>> name to be input by hand, with something that
>> quotes the contents of a cell ?
and you answered,
>You can do that.....
>Something like this:
AC AB >10 {GOTO}AB12~{?} >11 {DOWN}/FS >12 the name will go
here >13 ~ >14 here you need the keys to do the confirm >dance
123 does before saving >they'll depend on whether the sheet is
>being replaced or created....
Thanks to your advice I could adapt your proposal to my case
and it works flawlessly ! The most important change is that I
have put instead of the file name a function which refers to
it (@string(K2,0), as I keep changing the file name in K2 all
the time and as there is no space around K2 to put the code
there in a column.
I have not answered before be because I was an a 10 day trip
and was not able to dedicate the necessary 10 minutes to the
problem.
Thank you very much for your help.
Best regards
Winfried
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 15:58:49 -0800
Reply-To: HPLX Mailing List ,
"Peter A. Castro"
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: "Peter A. Castro"
Subject: Re: Fluff: Re: Minix (Linux) on the palmtop.
Comments: To: KenLondon
In-Reply-To: <3AA0207C.EA708DF5@beld.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
On Fri, 2 Mar 2001, KenLondon wrote:
> "Peter A. Castro" wrote:
>
> > OK, *now* I know you're trolling, Ken. I did network apps development on
> > the platform for 5 years. It was quite stable and had some really great
> > features (eg: Clustering). Most likely, the only think that crashed on
> > VMS was your applications, not the system. I'll grant you VMS was very
> > large and expensive, but everything from DEC was :-)
>
> In general the entire system crashed very often, Many times when I had no
> applications running.
Most likely a hardware problem. I remember our old 11/750 had a disk
controller go out once. The system continued to run, only logging
complaints about the controller. I recall it only fell over once (blew a
memory board). Replaced the board and it was back up in no time (wasn't
cheap, though). Most others who I've talked with concerning VAX hardware
have has similar good experiences. I guess yours was just one of the
unlucky ones. It happens.
--
Peter A. Castro or
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 17:27:50 -0700
Reply-To: HPLX Mailing List , kopplin@TECHNOIR.NU
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Mike Kopplin
Subject: Re: Fluff: Re: Minix (Linux) on the palmtop.
Comments: To: "Peter A. Castro"
In-Reply-To:
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
On Fri, 2 Mar 2001, Peter A. Castro wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Mar 2001, KenLondon wrote:
> > "Peter A. Castro" wrote:
> > > OK, *now* I know you're trolling, Ken. I did network apps development on
> > > the platform for 5 years. It was quite stable and had some really great
> > > features (eg: Clustering). Most likely, the only think that crashed on
> > > VMS was your applications, not the system. I'll grant you VMS was very
> > > large and expensive, but everything from DEC was :-)
> >
> > In general the entire system crashed very often, Many times when I had no
> > applications running.
>
> Most likely a hardware problem. I remember our old 11/750 had a disk
> controller go out once. The system continued to run, only logging
> complaints about the controller. I recall it only fell over once (blew a
> memory board). Replaced the board and it was back up in no time (wasn't
> cheap, though). Most others who I've talked with concerning VAX hardware
> have has similar good experiences. I guess yours was just one of the
> unlucky ones. It happens.
I seem to recall reading a couple years ago about an 11/750 in
the UK that hadn't been rebooted since 1983 and was still
running.
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 18:55:24 -0600
Reply-To: HPLX Mailing List ,
Evan Person
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Evan Person
Subject: Re: Fluff: Re: Minix (Linux) on the palmtop.
Comments: To: kopplin@TECHNOIR.NU
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> I seem to recall reading a couple years ago about an 11/750 in
> the UK that hadn't been rebooted since 1983 and was still
> running.
It must have been running Ultrix. Anyone who has
had to endure the pain of doing software development
on VMS feels like they've died and gone to heaven
when they've made the transition to UNIX. At least
I did. I still occasionally have to do VMS development,
only enough to remind me of the bad old days and to
make me want to run back to UNIX.
Evan
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 23:27:53 -0000
Reply-To: HPLX Mailing List ,
Owen Samuelson
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Owen Samuelson
Subject: Re: Does Flash Ram lose everything when you remove it?
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> Not with any flash ram cards that I know of.
>
> Whatever you write to the card generally stays there till
you take it off
> (unless it sits for a couple of years).
>
> - Longden
I remember somewhere I saw that data retention for my
sandisk card was
something like 100 years. I hope I live to verify that. I
know my 200lx will.
Hello Longden.
Owen
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2001 09:03:54 +0100
Reply-To: HPLX Mailing List ,
HP Staber
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: HP Staber
Subject: Re: PALMPC contra PALRUN
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> > Stefan Peichl wrote:
> >
> > However on my desktop QWERTZ keyboard,
> > the scancode of Z is 15 hex, which is more
> > correct because it is exactly it's location on
> > the keyboard.
>
> What is a QWERTZ keyboard? Obviously it's a different
> arrangement but I've never heard of this. Where and when and
> why is that used?
German keybords have the Y and the Z key swapped compared to the
English keyboard. QWERTZ is then the 6 letters on the left side of the
first row of the keyboard.
Anyway : thanks for the explanation, Stefan. However the existing
PalEdit setup/macros run in PALRUN environment but not in PALMPC
environment. There must be something more with PALMPC.
HP Staber/Salzburg
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2001 01:06:38 -0700
Reply-To: HPLX Mailing List , kopplin@TECHNOIR.NU
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Mike Kopplin
Subject: FLUFF: Website statistics
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
It's a slow Friday night on the list and I'm still at work after
a very long day, so I thought I'd waste a little bandwidth.
I upgraded my web server at home today (HPLX-L archives,
LX-Mapblast pages, etc). It could no longer handle updating
all the indexes for the archive search, and was starting to get
overwhelmed in other tasks as well. Now it has twice the ram,
and about 3 times the cpu power. That should be sufficient for a
while.
Anyway, I generated stats for the website and thought I'd share
a few of the more interesting bits. I get a little over 2200
hits per day on average. A lot of these are webcrawlers for
google,etc., or people coming to my site from their search
pages. The log files contain the search terms they used. Many
people come looking for "crack"s for various software. Of course
the dreaded hinge crack has made that a common word in the list.
"abandonware" is also a popular search term. Oddly,
"abondonware" (with an o) isn't too far behind. Strangest
though is the most popular search phrase, "autopsy pictures", at
157 requests. Some wierd people out there.
Looking at Browser types, WWW/LX makes a good showing at third
place after MS explorer and Netscape. It's a distant third, but
it does beat out all the other browsers.
The LX-Mapblast pages continue to be popular. Over 8000 maps so
far have been served. I've found a few more sites sending
requests to scripts on my server to run their own pages. Most
are just little sites, with little traffic. One I found quite
surprising though. There's a page on Comcast Corporations
website (Comcast Cable, Comcast@Home, QVC, Philadelphia 76ers
and Flyers, etc.) using my driving directions script. You'd
think they would have someone in house that could set it up.
Actually I don't find it annoying, but rather quite
amusing. This huge corporation, with several internet companies,
sneaking in and using the services of my little personal
webserver.
Well, sorry for wasting all the bandwidth, but at least it
wasn't about linux, which of course is running the server, but
that's another thread.
Cheers,
Mike Kopplin
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2001 01:32:21 -0800
Reply-To: HPLX Mailing List ,
Alfred Lee
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Alfred Lee
Subject: Re: HP in the news İFLUFF¨
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Didn't IBM dictated that you can have 16k RAM, 64k RAM if you
are very serious and who could ever use 128k RAM, hence a
hard beyond-the-end-of-the-world limit of 640k architectural limit
for DOS in 1981 (or 1980?)?
Alfred
-----Original Message-----
From: Barry
To: HPLX-L@uconnvm.uconn.edu
Date: Friday, March 02, 2001 4:36 PM
Subject: Re: HP in the news İFLUFF¨
İdelete¨
>That will leave the world with Dos and a form of CP/M. The
>world doesn't need a computer with more than 640k RAM anyway.
>
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2001 12:31:53 +0100
Reply-To: "Owen H. Morgan"
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: "Owen H. Morgan"
Subject: Re: Auto switch off. Something strange is going on.
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi again.
I'm replying to my own posting for once...
I wrote (>):
> I seem to remember that when I first started
> messing about with the LX, I couldn't get it to
> timeout and switch itself off for love nor money
> if it was connected to external power. Now it
> suddenly does.
I figured it out.
> I've checked with LXSTAT, and the LX knows that it
> has external power. Anyway, the batteries would
> have been flat by now if the external power didn't
> work..
The batteries _were_ flat! I still don't understand why it switched itself =
off when connected to external power in spite of LXSTAT T 0. As long as =
external power is present, the state of the batteries shouldn't matter?
I seem to remember someone said there are issues with using the built in =
battery charger, so I'd disabled it and just set up an appointment to =
switch the charger on for an hour once a week. Since I always use the LX =
with external power, I would have thought this was enough, but clearly it =
wasn't. Anybody have any idea how much battery charging per week would be =
enough to keep the NiMh's up when the LX is always on external power, or =
maybe I'd be better off using alkalines. How long would a set of alkalines =
last if I always use external power?
PS. I can't use the built in charging software or any of the third party =
ones because the HFFAX software takes over the interrupts, so they won't =
work.
Owen
--
On a sailboat. In Norway
http://pagina.de/naomi.j=
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2001 01:58:57 +1300
Reply-To: HPLX Mailing List ,
Tony Kan
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Tony Kan
Subject: FLUFF: Geos OS for omnibook?
Comments: To: Andrew King
In-Reply-To: <3A9FA214.2E30C602@mediaone.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Ooops. its www.newdealinc.com Yes, Newdeal works on top of DOS.
Cheers
Tony.
-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew King İmailto:aking5@mediaone.net¨
Sent: Saturday, 3 March 2001 02:37
To: tony.kan@CLEAR.NET.NZ
Cc: omnilist@elektro.cmhnet.org
Subject: Geos OS for omnibook?
Quoted from the HPLX mailing list:
>Subject: Re: FLUFF: Re: HP in the news
> Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 09:12:17 +1300
> From: Tony Kan
>
>Geos has been resurrected as NewDeal (see www.newdeal.com). It only
>supports 286 AT class computers and above. Notwithstanding that, it >gives
80-90% of the functionality of MS Windows/MS Office while only >taking up
10Mb of HDD space. Its breathed new life into my 486 >Thinkpad 701c! For
example, NewDeal has a built in word processor, >flat file database and
spreadsheet. Lots of people still have the >earlier Geoworks which does
work on an XT class machine and these >early versions are still file
compatible with NewDeal.
>HTH
Tony, I tried the URL for newdeal but couldn't find it.
This looks like just the thing for the early Omnibooks so I'm
copying this to the omnibook list.
Does NewDeal run on top of DOS? My Omnibook 435 boots to DOS
5.0.
I think an OS that runs on top of DOS would be preferable since
some of the hardware in the Omnibook is not entirely standard.b
Does anyone else on the Omnibook list know anything about
Geos/Newdeal?
--
Andrew King
Ann Arbor Michigan
technology is the answer, what was the question?
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2001 04:58:44 -0800
Reply-To: hobchi@hotmail.com
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: hobchi
Subject: Re: Group project
Comments: To: Longden_Loo@CANDLE.COM
In-Reply-To:
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> He was just kidding. I'm sure Nathalie knows
> that ... she's pretty smart
> .... even on low batteries.
>
> - Longden
>
and kute too...
yor pal al.
=====
.
o__
_.>/)_
(_) \(_)
Woman, that's warm...
Semper Mobilus
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2001 08:33:19 -0500
Reply-To: HPLX Mailing List ,
Ken Hansen
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Ken Hansen
Subject: Re: HP in the news İFLUFF¨
Comments: To: Alfred Lee
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
I was under the impression that the memory map of the first IBM PCs was
dictated by the design of the 8088 CPU, that the unit fit everything inside
a 1 Meg address space because that made it easier to program, design the
hardware, etc.
Also, remember how much RAM a mainframe had in those days - 16 Meg on a
mainframe was a reasonable memory size, IIRC -of course that is 16 Meg of
Words, wich on the mainframe was something like 24 or 32 bits wide, with a
very good paging/swap mechanisim. MVS only supported 16 Meg memory sizes
until MVS/XA came out and opened up the are above the 16 Meg "boundry".
Thus ends the history lesson ;¬)
Ken
----- Original Message -----
From: "Alfred Lee"
To:
Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2001 4:32 AM
Subject: Re: HP in the news İFLUFF¨
> Didn't IBM dictated that you can have 16k RAM, 64k RAM if you
> are very serious and who could ever use 128k RAM, hence a
> hard beyond-the-end-of-the-world limit of 640k architectural limit
> for DOS in 1981 (or 1980?)?
>
> Alfred
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Barry
> To: HPLX-L@uconnvm.uconn.edu
> Date: Friday, March 02, 2001 4:36 PM
> Subject: Re: HP in the news İFLUFF¨
>
>
>
> İdelete¨
>
> >That will leave the world with Dos and a form of CP/M. The
> >world doesn't need a computer with more than 640k RAM anyway.
> >
>
> ** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
>
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2001 08:33:35 -0600
Reply-To: HPLX Mailing List ,
Barry
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Barry
Subject: Re: Geos on the HP200LX
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Jimmy said:
>
> GEOS is well suited for devices with
> touch-screen capability. But the 200LX
> does not have it so is there any point
> to run it on one?
Geos can work with touch screens but it was designed for use
with a keyboard. Touch screen capability was added later when
it began to be used on PDAs.
Barry
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2001 15:23:26 +0100
Reply-To: Luettjohann@gmx.de
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Stephan L|ttjohann
Subject: Compact Flash Problem
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hi!
I've got a problem with my 48MB San-Disk. Anyhow I sometimes
cannot write to it. There are some (I don't know how many) bad
allocation units on it. How can I mark them or remove them?
I tried to use Windows to mark them, but it only marked some of
them. It didn't examine the whole flash disk. I used scandisk's
"surface analysis" (is that right in English?).
Regards,
Stephan
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2001 09:02:56 -0600
Reply-To: HPLX Mailing List ,
Barry
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Barry
Subject: Re: Fluff: Re: Minix (Linux) on the palmtop.
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Chris Lott wrote:
>
> I was just discussing yesterday with my
> business partner why we don't hear much
> about replacement command.com
> command line interpreters being, or
> having been, available for DOS...
4Dos was one command.com replacement that got a little bit
popular for a while. I seem to remember there was another one
but I can't think what it was.
I used 4Dos for a short time and I liked it. It was a
significant improvement over dos 3.x. A lot of the same
improvements were added to dos 4 and 5.
The problem with having a better command line interpreter is
that you don't have the same command line interpreter that
others have. Using it at home it was different than my computer
at work. When I put it on my computer at work it was different
than everyone else's computer. It was close enough that there
weren't major problems but there were enough small problems that
I finally removed it.
My initial purpose in trying it was to evaluate it for the whole
company. But as soon as you call tech support for some problem
they blame it on 4Dos. And you have to tell them because
there's always the chance that might really be the problem.
Tech support became very poor.
Someone in a previous post said that if you really know anything
about computers you don't use tech support. That's cute. I
know enough about computers that I can analyze any problem with
any combination of software and hardware, given enough time.
I'm not quite sure how my boss would have felt about me pouring
over disassemblies of the programs we use looking for a conflict
that turns out to be a known problem that I could have found in
10 minutes with a phone call.
Well, that's not true. I'm pretty sure how he would have felt
about that. :)
Also we had a few pretty savvy users who called tech support on
their own when they ran into a problem with a commercial
program. It wouldn't pay to make that difficult for them. Of
course this was in the days before networks forced us to control
everything.
Barry
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2001 16:26:29 +0200
Reply-To: HPLX Mailing List ,
Daniel Hertrich
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Daniel Hertrich
Subject: WTB: Keyboard foil
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Hi friends,
as some of you know I'm always collecting palmtop parts and sometimes
I'm able to build a new machine when I've got enough parts.
Thanks to Helmuth G|nther (Helmuth, you know why ;-)) the time has
come again :-¨ (almost):
What I still need is a keyboard foil. I speak of this one with the
little blobs which are responsible for the key klicks and which
establish the contacts if you press a key (a transparent foil with
black dots, one dot per key).
Of course also an entire keyboard would help, maybe someone has one
left with broken keys or so.
Please offer, if you have. Preferrably in Europe, and write how much you
would like to get for it.
Thanks a lot!!
GTX
daniel
--
Celia & Daniel Hertrich d.hertrich@gmx.de
home page: http://www.daniel-hertrich.de
mobile phone: +49 (0)177 7955549
unified messaging (fax,voice): +49 (0)721 151 306690
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2001 09:47:59 -0600
Reply-To: HPLX Mailing List ,
Barry
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Barry
Subject: Re: Fluff: Re: Minix (Linux) on the palmtop.
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Laust Brock-Nannestad wrote:
>
> The Mortice-Kern-Systems Toolkit also
> came with a Korn shell, and I believe
> they devised a way of allowing the shell
> to expand file patterns and pass the
> command line on to the program being
> run, but without hitting the MS-DOS
> command line limit (probably used a
> temporary file).
This should be fairly straightforward using your own command
line interpreter. It could accept any command line length you
choose. It would only have to be sure that only 127 characters
was passed to any given program because of the PSP.
Offhand, I can't think of any other restrictions.
Barry
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2001 08:06:14 -0800
Reply-To: HPLX Mailing List ,
Longden_Loo@CANDLE.COM
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Longden Loo
Subject: Re: Auto switch off. Something strange is going on.
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> The batteries _were_ flat! I still don't understand why it switched
itself off
> when connected to external power in spite of LXSTAT T 0. As long as
external
> power is present, the state of the batteries shouldn't matter?
That's my understanding also. Could be that there was a burp in your AC?
A disruption coupled with flat batteries would've shut things down pretty
fast.
> I seem to remember someone said there are issues with using the built in
battery
> charger, so I'd disabled it and just set up an appointment to switch the
charger
> on for an hour once a week. Since I always use the LX with external
power, I
> would have thought this was enough, but clearly it wasn't. Anybody have
any idea
> how much battery charging per week would be enough to keep the NiMh's up
when
> the LX is always on external power, or maybe I'd be better off using
alkalines.
> How long would a set of alkalines last if I always use external power?
I have my LX plugged into AC at work 8-10 hours per day. That kind of
usage coupled with the occasional need to use it unplugged leaves me having
to recharge the NiMHs once every couple of months or so.
As a test, you might want to fully charge the NiMHs and check the charge
level daily for a week or so. The charge shouldn't drop significantly with
the LX plugged in continuously, but then NiMHs are notorious for high
self-discharge rates and the 1hour per week of recharge may not be
compensating enough. Just a guess ... it could be that your batteries have
a higher self-discharge rate than usual.
> PS. I can't use the built in charging software or any of the third party
ones
> because the HFFAX software takes over the interrupts, so they won't work.
You might just have to try different brands of batteries.
Also, if the LX is always on AC and the AAs are simply a backup ... you
might want to consider switching to non-rechargeable lithium AAs which have
a long shelf life (5 years).
- Longden
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2001 08:36:52 -0800
Reply-To: HPLX Mailing List ,
Longden_Loo@CANDLE.COM
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Longden Loo
Subject: Re: Compact Flash Problem
Comments: cc: Luettjohann@gmx.de
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> I've got a problem with my 48MB San-Disk. Anyhow I sometimes
> cannot write to it. There are some (I don't know how many) bad
> allocation units on it. How can I mark them or remove them?
> I tried to use Windows to mark them, but it only marked some of
> them. It didn't examine the whole flash disk. I used scandisk's
> "surface analysis" (is that right in English?).
Bad allocation units are fixed using either scandisk or "chkdsk /f".
But it sounds like you're talking about bad clusters if you did a scandisk
"surface analysis", which can include the main disk data areas as well as
the file allocation table (FAT).
Scandisk should've been able to mark all unreadable clusters as bad. If
that didn't work, I'd try another utility, like Norton.
It could also be that you have a defective card.
- Longden
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2001 17:43:55 +0100
Reply-To: "Owen H. Morgan"
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: "Owen H. Morgan"
Subject: FLUFF: EPOC (Was: HP in the news)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Howdy!
Martin Bergvill wrote (>):
> If we can get some more info from the zip vs
> Hplx guy you could maybe throw out your
> laptop and use the Hplx for zip drive access :-)
I was thinking about this. If we could hook him up with a very smart EPOC =
developer / C++ programmer, we could probably get a driver for EPOC too.
>> I do _ALL_ my serious computing on the
>> palmtop.
> "Palmtop" as in "Hplx" or "Palmtop" as in "Mc218"? :-)
MC218 of course. I said "serious computing". (Ooops! Better get into my =
flameproof suit fast... :o)
> I have one mind and need just one application
> at a time, but soon I have a SC DS 64mb
> Hplx..
So how much do you have to pay for your LX on steroids? You can pick up a =
second hand MC218 or 5mx for around NOK 2500 - 3000 (USD 260 - 315) on QXL. =
Of course you'd need a 48Mb CF to bring it up to 64Mb. I know _you_ don't =
like the keyboard on the S5 based machines, but I do, and there are a few =
million people in the world who use these computers every day and do like =
the keyboard, so you're outvoted... You probably just need to get used to =
it.
> Then I maybe could do what you do but do I
> need to do it?
You couldn't, could you? AFAIK, there is no way you could make the LX =
download anything in the background while you're working in the foreground. =
Anyway, that isn't the main reason I like my multitasking OS. I just =
started Navigator packing some _big_ database files to a ZIP archive while =
I type this. Oh, I checked, it's finished! I like not having to sit around =
waiting for that.
I find it very useful to be able to have my most used applications open all =
the time so I can get instant access. For instance if the phone rings while =
I'm typing this e-mail and I need to take notes or dig out an address or =
something, I can go to the contacts application instantly without saving =
the e-mail or closing the application. I know this is possible on the LX =
too, but that is with third party software. In EPOC it's an integral part =
of the OS, and we take it for granted. On the LX it's really only for =
advanced users like you lot. Another useful feature is cutting and pasting =
across applications etc. I have some very smart macros that use this =
capability for archiving e-mails to database files etc.
> Yes I already guessed :-). Nokia has Epoc on
> their 9000 (Geos??) and 9110 soon the 9210
> _phones_ with pim cabability . But they are
> _not_ palmtops.
The 9000 and 9110 have Geos, but Nokia dropped it in favour of EPOC for the =
9210. IIRC the OS on the 9000 / 9110 is rather limited and there isn't much =
software for it. I have no idea if this is a limitation of GEOS or the =
implementation on the Nokia.
As far as I understand, the EPOC 9210 has all, or most of the software on a =
standard S5, S5mx, MC218 or Revo, so in my mind it's really just a palmtop =
with a phone built in. Apart from the phone, I believe there is very little =
practical difference between a Revo and a Nokia 9210. How does the built in =
phone stop it from being a palmtop? The Ericsson R380 phone / PIM also runs =
EPOC, but that is a limited edition with no possibillity of adding third =
party applications etc., so that's why I didn't mention it.
> You have this advanced epoc Os but you can
> not get the line length down to the required
> length
Required by whom? I don't like e-mail software that hacks my text into =
little bits with a CR on every line. That's not the way _proper_ word =
processing software should work!
> which I can with this "outdated dying machine"
> running Www/lx. :-))
I often send manuscripts for articles etc. as e-mail, and would hate it if =
they were hacked into little bits, and so would my Mom who proof-reads for =
me and the editors who would have to go through my manuscripts and remove =
all the unwanted CR's! I can make my MC218 do this if I want to by =
disabling MIME, but if I do that, any attachments I send will be uuencoded.
> (Yes when I read the message my
> mail program wraps the lines and everything is
> okey, but when I reply your lines
> are _very_ long)
I use a nice freeware macro on my MC218 which does a very good job of =
cutting the text into bits and inserting the ( >) when I reply to e-mails.
> (Owen I am just pulling you leg :-))
Can you please pull the other one? I've got a limp!
> About 200km from you and your sailboat :-)
Please, please I don't want 200km legs. They won't fit into my bed! Around =
10m would be OK. That would make it easy to change the lightbulb in my =
anchor light...
Owen
--
On a sailboat. In Norway
http://pagina.de/naomi.j=
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2001 15:38:37 -0800
Reply-To: mikeschn@ameritech.net
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Mike Schneider
Subject: Re: FLUFF: Geos OS for omnibook?
Comments: To: Tony Kan
In-Reply-To:
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
I keep getting an error downloading the file. It blows up on me during the
last second. Anyone else have that error? Any suggestions?
Mike...
> Ooops. its www.newdealinc.com Yes, Newdeal works on top of DOS.
> Cheers
> Tony.
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2001 23:01:47 +0200
Reply-To: HPLX Mailing List ,
Daniel Hertrich
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Daniel Hertrich
Subject: Re: HP in the news
Comments: To: Ken London
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Hi Ken,
On Thu, 1 Mar 2001 22:09:38 -0500, Ken London wrote:
> People keep saying how great Linux is. As far as I can tell it is a
> miserable
> failure because it can't run on the 200lx. That makes it no better than
> DOS.
So, also software such as SAP or Adobe Photoshop or SimCity 2000 are
failures?? Ken, what you say here is a little bit - excuse me -
...strange.
The 200LX is a great machine, but it is not the center of the world.
There is also software around that's _not_ designed to run on the 200LX.
Believe it or not.
GTX
daniel
--
Celia & Daniel Hertrich d.hertrich@gmx.de
home page: http://www.daniel-hertrich.de
mobile phone: +49 (0)177 7955549
unified messaging (fax,voice): +49 (0)721 151 306690
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2001 18:16:28 -0500
Reply-To: theise@netins.net
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Theodore Heise
Subject: Re: Auto switch off. Something strange is going on.
Longden Loo writes:
> > The batteries _were_ flat! I still don't understand why it switched
> itself off
> > when connected to external power in spite of LXSTAT T 0. As long as
> external
> > power is present, the state of the batteries shouldn't matter?
>
> That's my understanding also. Could be that there was a burp in your AC?
> A disruption coupled with flat batteries would've shut things down pretty
> fast.
Ah. That triggered a thought. My 200LX will sometimes power off when
I *think* it's on AC. I usually find the adaptor plug isn't fully seated
in the socket and it was actually running on batteries.
Ted
--
Theodore W. Heise West Lafayette, IN, USA
PGP public key: http://showcase.netins.net/web/twheise/theise.txt
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2001 17:24:59 -0600
Reply-To: HPLX Mailing List ,
Bryan Biggers
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Bryan Biggers
Subject: Re: HP in the news
Comments: To: Daniel Hertrich
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Daniel Hertrich wrote:
>
>
> So, also software such as SAP or Adobe Photoshop or SimCity 2000 are
> failures?? Ken, what you say here is a little bit - excuse me -
> ...strange.
> The 200LX is a great machine, but it is not the center of the world.
> There is also software around that's _not_ designed to run on the 200LX.
> Believe it or not.
>
There is a DOS version of SimCity 2000, we have it. (No, it will
not run on the HP200, ha).
Bryan
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2001 19:45:16 -0500
Reply-To: HPLX Mailing List ,
Ken London
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Ken London
Subject: Re: HP in the news
Comments: To: Bryan Biggers
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Bryan Biggers wrote:
> > The 200LX is a great machine, but it is not the center of the world.
I beg to differ, as far as I'm concerned it is.........
Nothing out there approaches the 200lx in usefullness.
** HPLX-L LIST Info at http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mchem1/HPLX.shtml
=========================================================================
Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2001 20:05:25 -0800
Reply-To: HPLX Mailing List ,
Mike Schneider
Sender: HPLX Mailing List
From: Mike Schneider